Re: [Sugar-devel] transition from activities/all to activities portal

2009-06-18 Thread Samuel Klein
This sounds good.  Making the how-to-upload tutorial more prominent
will help as well.  So that new releases such as [[jam2jam]] are put
in the right place...  SJ

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Rafael Enrique Ortiz
Guerrero wrote:
> Hello David.
>
> That's the best option in my opinion.
>
>
> cheers!.
> Rafael Ortiz
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:31 AM, David Farning 
> wrote:
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Upon further examining
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Browse_(8.2), I think that we can
>> maintain backwards compatibility both technically and socially by
>> using the existing /Activities/NAME_(VERSION) by pointing the links on
>> that page to
>>
>> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/sugar/addon/4024
>> and
>> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/sugar/downloads/latest/4024/
>>
>> This would not require any changes on currently deployed machines,
>> just server side url updates.  I need to double check that the version
>> detection happens correctly.
>>
>> Does this sound reasonable for a transition period?
>>
>> david
>> ___
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


Re: [Sugar-devel] transition from activities/all to activities portal

2009-06-18 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
Hello David.

That's the best option in my opinion.


cheers!.
Rafael Ortiz


On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 11:31 AM, David Farning wrote:

> Chris,
>
> Upon further examining
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Browse_(8.2),
> I think that we can
> maintain backwards compatibility both technically and socially by
> using the existing /Activities/NAME_(VERSION) by pointing the links on
> that page to
>
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/sugar/addon/4024
> and
> http://activities.sugarlabs.org/sugar/downloads/latest/4024/
>
> This would not require any changes on currently deployed machines,
> just server side url updates.  I need to double check that the version
> detection happens correctly.
>
> Does this sound reasonable for a transition period?
>
> david
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


[Sugar-devel] transition from activities/all to activities portal

2009-06-18 Thread David Farning
Chris,

Upon further examining
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities/Browse_(8.2), I think that we can
maintain backwards compatibility both technically and socially by
using the existing /Activities/NAME_(VERSION) by pointing the links on
that page to

http://activities.sugarlabs.org/sugar/addon/4024
and
http://activities.sugarlabs.org/sugar/downloads/latest/4024/

This would not require any changes on currently deployed machines,
just server side url updates.  I need to double check that the version
detection happens correctly.

Does this sound reasonable for a transition period?

david
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel