Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-03 Thread Bryan Berry
On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 10:26 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 20:30, Bryan Berry wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 19:18 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> without needing to get into what is better for our deployments, I do > >> see value in making easier to make Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Sounds very in line with what we have been talking to date, plus you add some very good ideas like using the integrated web server for accessing the journal. Also, some web (server side) developers have asked for some way of running web applications as Sugar activities. I guess in this scenario we

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-03 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 20:30, Bryan Berry wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 19:18 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Hi, >> >> without needing to get into what is better for our deployments, I do >> see value in making easier to make Sugar activities using technologies >> such as HTML, CSS, etc >> Bryan,

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-02 Thread Bryan Berry
this is neat Wade. It is a little more heavy weight for some activities. both google gears, flash, and the flash framework flex have some nice lightweight persistence functionality. On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 14:32 -0500, Wade Brainerd wrote: > The work we did for WikiBrowse (the WikipediaES and Wikip

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-02 Thread Wade Brainerd
The work we did for WikiBrowse (the WikipediaES and WikipediaEN) activities would make a good starting point. First of all the Browse code should be integrated into Sugar. This has been discussed before, and makes sense since you guys are maintaining the Browse activity anyway. The Browse code w

Re: [Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-02 Thread Bryan Berry
On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 19:18 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: > Hi, > > without needing to get into what is better for our deployments, I do > see value in making easier to make Sugar activities using technologies > such as HTML, CSS, etc > Bryan, can we get into a more detailed view on what it would tak

[Sugar-devel] web-based activities (was Re: [IAEP] How to Make Activity Designers Happy , Parts I and II)

2009-01-02 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
Hi, without needing to get into what is better for our deployments, I do see value in making easier to make Sugar activities using technologies such as HTML, CSS, etc Bryan, can we get into a more detailed view on what it would take ideally to create a new activity using such activities? Which wo