Re: [Sugar-devel] How to build from source?

2009-03-20 Thread Ivan Pulido
Hey Sascha, I made the list of dependencies for ArchLinux based on the sysdepends for Mandriva (as Tomeu advised). It's attached to this mail, and some dependencies were not found inside arch repos (maybe included in other packages or ahve different names?). Anyway take a look and let me know if

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to build from source?

2009-03-20 Thread Ivan Pulido
Ah sorry, forgot to tell you that the textfile includes also ArchLinux's repos (core, extra, community, AUR, etc). Hope this helps. Bye. On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Ivan Pulido mefistofele...@gmail.comwrote: Hey Sascha, I made the list of dependencies for ArchLinux based on the sysdepends

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] ActivityTeam coordinatorship

2009-03-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 18:36, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: Hey all, I was supposed to announce this after last week's ActivityTeam meeting but failed, ouch. The amount of time I have to contribute to Sugar Labs has been reducing steadily as my wife and I are expecting our first

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity platform discussion

2009-03-20 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 05:52:14AM +, Aleksey Lim wrote: On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 09:00:38PM -0400, Wade Brainerd wrote: But there are differences like Python 2.5 (SoaS1) vs 2.6 (SoaS2) that are independent of the SP. I guess these differences won't be very popular(otherwise they should

Re: [Sugar-devel] Print Support proposal (need input) Beta

2009-03-20 Thread Sean DALY
I can't speak for the classroom, but in the house I have two kids very active with their Mac computers and often wishing to print. I think printing is an area where lots of little things can go wrong which need grownups to sort out. I have a single printer connected to a computer on the main

[Sugar-devel] [BRANCHING] sugar and sugar-toolkit

2009-03-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
Hi, sugar and sugar-toolkit have been branched for Sucrose 0.84. May the 0.86 for those interested begin, Simon ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Print Support proposal Final(input please)

2009-03-20 Thread Vamsi Krishna Davuluri
I have come up with two approaches: I will be concise this time. And try to talk less on sugarizing it. Thanks to tomeu and silbe, and a little fiddling around, it is now clear that rendering to pdf is in no way dependent on CUPS, it can be done with the cairo libs, and gtk print. And even

Re: [Sugar-devel] Changing the mail header for activities.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-20 Thread David Farning
Kushal, Could you send more of the email context? I am having trouble tracking this down:( thanks david On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 11:42 PM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. The mails from activities.s.o which had information about my activity nomination shows subject line as :

Re: [Sugar-devel] Print Support proposal Final(input please)

2009-03-20 Thread Vamsi Krishna Davuluri
send* ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Changing the mail header for activities.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-20 Thread Ivan Krstić
On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:15 PM, David Farning wrote: Could you send more of the email context? I am having trouble tracking this down:( ./site/app/controllers/components/editors.php, line 140: $this-controller-Email-subject = sprintf(_('Mozilla Add-ons: %s Nomination'), $emailInfo['name']);

Re: [Sugar-devel] Changing the mail header for activities.sugarlabs.org

2009-03-20 Thread David Farning
Thanks Ivan I am fixing it now. Should push to production tomorrow morning. david On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Ivan Krstić krs...@solarsail.hcs.harvard.edu wrote: On Mar 20, 2009, at 4:15 PM, David Farning wrote: Could you send more of the email context?  I am having trouble tracking

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-0.84.1

2009-03-20 Thread Simon Schampijer
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar/sugar-0.84.1.tar.bz2 == Fixed tickets == * Update to latest NM-User config file (same as nm-applet) * Fix nondeterministic denials for no-interface messages #575 (Thanks to Dan Williams and Colin Walters for their

[Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] sugar-toolkit-0.84.1

2009-03-20 Thread Tomeu Vizoso
== Source == http://download.sugarlabs.org/sources/sucrose/glucose/sugar-toolkit/sugar-toolkit-0.84.1.tar.bz2 == Fixed tickets == * #504 XO figure crown soles clipped in panel label * #397 bundlebuilder: dist_source hangs when git repository contains too many files * #157 Icon sizes not reset

Re: [Sugar-devel] tokenized text fields?

2009-03-20 Thread Eben Eliason
These aren't implemented anywhere, as far as I know. I don't know if GTK itself has something similar which we could subclass, or if we're on our own. These fields would play a huge role in making tagging more natural and less time consuming, so I'd welcome anyone who wants to take on the task.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

2009-03-20 Thread Tom spot Callaway
On 03/20/2009 03:38 PM, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote: Isn't it possible to figure that out with a bit of bash programming? Eg., use the 'comm' command. comm Compare two sorted files line by line and, if different, a diff could be generated to show you exactly what's different. Doesn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

2009-03-20 Thread Lyos Gemini Norezel
Tom spot Callaway wrote: On 03/20/2009 03:38 PM, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote: Isn't it possible to figure that out with a bit of bash programming? Eg., use the 'comm' command. comm Compare two sorted files line by line and, if different, a diff could be generated to show you exactly