2018-05-16 23:09 GMT+02:00 James Cameron :
>
> Thanks for the reminder; I've rebased the Sugar Labs clone of your
> Sugarizer repository.
>
Nice. Thanks.
>
> > I think it's the right time to build a Sugarizer FAQ. I'm answering
> > below on questions asked during this meeting but I will be plea
2018-05-16 23:25 GMT+02:00 Walter Bender :
As a sometimes activity maintainer, my biggest issue is that I get zero
> feedback from the deployments about bugs or anything else for that matter.
> This is true for both Sugar and Sugarizer.
>
Yes, it's true.
> 1. How do I keep, for example, Turtle
Hi Lionel and all,
I just subscribed to this list again, 'feels good!
Lionel Laské writes:
> I'm not familiar with Linux packaging but if a guy would like to
> package Sugarizer as a Linux package, I could help.
I may be worth exploring https://www.flatpak.org for this.
2 cts,
--
Bastien
_
Hi Walter and Lionel,
Lionel Laské writes:
> 2. Do you have a plan for reconciling the licensing issue [2]?
> The issue is marked as Wont Fix, but I don't think that is
> adequate. In addition, there has been a lot of unilateral
> re-licensing of GPL and AGPL content to Apache. T
On 17 May 2018 at 13:44, Lionel Laské wrote:
>
>
> 2. Do you have a plan for reconciling the licensing issue [2]? The issue
>> is marked as Wont Fix, but I don't think that is adequate. In addition,
>> there has been a lot of unilateral re-licensing of GPL and AGPL content to
>> Apache. This is n
5 matches
Mail list logo
