[Sugar-devel] Development Team Meeting, 22th May 11AM UTC

Developers are invited to attend the next team meeting, on; - Tuesday 22nd May at 7am US/Eastern, - Tuesday 22nd May at 11am UTC, - Tuesday 22nd May at 4:30pm IST, - Tuesday 22nd May at 9pm Australia/Sydney, Agenda to include - what we have been working on, #sugar-meeting irc.freenode.net --

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1)

There were two repositories. You destroyed, by ignoring, commits to those repositories. You've done it several times now; but I'm not surprised, as you aren't an activity maintainer yet. GTK+ is the name to the toolkit according to both The GTK+ Project and Wikipedia. It deserves a "+" because

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1)

I really wish you would be a bit more careful with the facts. There was no repository for this activity, so it is impossible that i destroyed anything. Why would you merge translations from one activity to another when neither has been ported to GTK3? Porting to GTK3 (no evidence that it

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1)

You repeated that I destroyed something. Ignoring commits does not mean there was destruction. I apologize again for my ignorance of the fact that people were developing and maintaining activities in cyberspace. Git history or no, the important point is to have working activities available to

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1)

TL;DR. Too long, didn't read. What I did read doesn't match with the situation and practice; and you're not an activity maintainer, so I don't think you know what you are talking about. Development process is optimised for activity maintainers, not integrators and certainly not users. If any

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1)

Naturally it is easy to comment on what you haven't read. When you propose a change to practice - it certainly isn't going to match. Current practice finds us with almost 80 activities which have been ported to GTK3 and which are not available to users via ASLO. I am an activity maintainer -

[Sugar-devel] State of Sugar (was: [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1))

Hi James and all, let me deliberately sidetrack the issue at stake with a larger issue which I'm curious about: what is the current activity status of Sugar? Since I've been unsubscribed from the list a few years ago (because my @laptop.org alias somehow died), I've missed a lot. I'm aware of

Re: [Sugar-devel] State of Sugar (was: [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1))

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 07:08:43AM +0200, Bastien wrote: > Hi James and all, > > let me deliberately sidetrack the issue at stake with a larger issue > which I'm curious about: what is the current activity status of Sugar? > > Since I've been unsubscribed from the list a few years ago (because

Re: [Sugar-devel] [sugarlabs/ajedrez-activity] Adding A Suitable License (#1)

The situation of unreleased yet ported activities is not a consequence of process, but of missing-in-action activity maintainers, and porting by GCI and GSoC. Your choice not to contribute your time for this is noted. It is a tempting move; I could simplify my work by focusing on maintaining

Re: [Sugar-devel] State of Sugar

Thanks for the quick feedback! James Cameron writes: > I've just checked a mail server; we still have an alias b...@laptop.org > pointing at b...@altern.org. Let me know if you don't need it. Oh, nice. Thanks for proposing. b...@altern.org is dead indeed. Can you point