to read and to quote.
Also, this is what git-send-email does by default, and what git-am
expects as input. Therefore, by following this convention you never
have to leave your precious shell to exchange patches over email :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
()
elapsed_time = end_time - start_time
print elapsed_time
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
much slower (loading? parsing?
rendering?) and fix it, it would impact all of Sugar. This might be
an interesting opportunity!
Let me have a look this afternoon!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org
benchmarking between the two?
I'm not sure we'd ever want to add a dependency on libagg and
wxWindows, but it would give an idea of how good or bad our current
stack is.
The gnash folks, for instance, report huge performance gains by
switching from cairo to antigrain.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http
@ list: it's been
fixed a couple of days ago, but the rest of the traffic went through
osuosl's RT.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
for project names?
Gitorious uses intentionally two separate names, the slug, which is
a single lowercase word for the URL, and a pretty print project title.
Bernie said you have an account. It is the one at shell.sugarlabs.org.
Yes.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
Forgot to notify sugar-devel@
Original Message
Subject: [Systems] git.sugarlabs.org down?
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:45:17 -0500
From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
Organization: Sugar Labs Foundation - http://sugarlabs.org/
To: OSU-OSL Support supp...@osuosl.org
CC: Sugar
while rendering the main project page.
The errant user_id belonged to a user who got locked out and had asked
to be deleted. Now we know to be careful not to break referential
integrity if we ever need to hack the database again :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
Walter Bender wrote:
Wow!!
We have great release notes lately.
To credit authors, I'd also append the patch summary by author,
Linus-style. It can quickly be obtained this way:
git log v0.83.3..HEAD | git-shortlog
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
it looks super ugly in the subject of an email.
- To reduce clutter, I'd make the SL prefix implied, and leave
other prefixes such as OLPC#123 and RH#456 explicit.
Do we have a wiki page where we can document these practices?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar
that for packages only maintained upstream at Sugarlabs
there is no need to add it to eah and eery bug hint.
I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch to using the
Closes: header in the body, where we have no size constraints, then
we could has well use the prefix consistently.
--
// Bernie
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch to using the
Closes: header in the body, where we have no size constraints, then
we could has well use the prefix consistently.
One
to the size of the file. Writeable file
mappings are just not supported by jffs2, and cause mmap() to return
an error.
glibc likes to do it when building the locale-archive, and I vaguely
remember I had a workaround for this in our fork of the glibc rpm.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http
workarounds is
going to cost a lot of time.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
it was
fixed, but apparently not. I'll check and let you know.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
[cc += sugar-de...@]
Victor Lazzarini wrote:
Thanks. Walter has kindly replied to me already, so it
looks like sugar labs is my destination. Hope to be able to
clear up all my marking by the end of next week and by
then I think will also know where I actually fit
the same proposal on the marketing list.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
not been shipped as an independent module and there
are no plans to do so.
Or does that mean that you have to split it out to a separate package
in order to comply with this D.P.P.?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org
:)
What version of the XO builds is being deployed?
With what base activities?
The page says that the technical team will develop new activities.
We would like to stay in contact with the developers on IRC and on
the sugar-devel mailing list.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
Sugar has replaced in 0.83.x where it used gnomevfs with GIO, so we
can drop that dependency.
Kudos!
Sugar is loosing bloat so quickly that, at this rate, it will
disappear by 1.0.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http
, or something like that.
I'd also like to discuss how our time-based releases relate with the
need to fix all blockers before a release.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Another issue is how we integrate the updater with addons.sl.o.
Because the OLPC microformat is trivial, it might be easy to modify
the remora's html output to be compatible with it. Mick, Tomeu and
David, who have had a closer look at the code, might want to comment
with
addons.sl.o as a backend.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
the mantra of doing only what nobody else is already doing.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
I guess at some point the default was Blocker, because there lots of
tickets marked that way in trac.
Yeah, we should re-prioritize them. Do we have a Bugmaster role?
We should
/me steps back... quickly!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
don't trust any
given individual to be able to do a good job without going through an
*extensive* iterative design process with public reviews of interim
drafts.
What's hardest about networking is that it looks deceptively easy at
first :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
on a nameserver running on the XS?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
the event only after
the state has settled for a certain amount of time.
This would take away a certain percentage of spurious updates, but the
number basically remains proportional to the number of users so it
doesn't scale much better.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar
with paravirtualized kernels.
Our sugarlabs4.xen.prgmr.com machine is already using it. Ask
dfarning for access to it while I'm still traveling around.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar
the actual status. Mick?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
/authorized_keys.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
You should be using gitorious@ rather than vepla...@.
Yes, it's awkward, but it's explained somewhere on the repository
page. Internally, gitorious dispatches individual users by means
to the gitorious machine too (a waste of time since you cannot log
anywhere else anyway).
Though I would swear I was able last week.
Check $SSK_AUTH_SOCK from sunjammer, and try ssh-add -l to ensure
that your keys are still available. Works for me.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X
have
hard-coded or special-cased the new default in their code.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
packaging addons in distros, but if there's any chance they want to
support source tarballs, we'll get that support for free.
Indeed!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar
. This way, at least, we
don't set the expectations of those few human posters too high.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
that!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
conversion.
Where does the bundle specification live these days? Last time I've
read it, it was still on wiki.laptop.org.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we
could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend.
Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release?
Did we announce it on Freshmeat? Slashdot? LWN? OLPCNews?
--
// Bernie
David Farning wrote:
Nice,
Are they running on a new machine at PGRMR?
Not yet. I pinged the prgmr.com folks about it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing
or two while the
disk is copied. I'll email you again before I do it. Thanks.
Nick Schmalenberger
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/video-chat-activity/
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
just
didn't get around to do it. Please, file a ticket for me so I don't forget.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
On 05/19/09 16:34, David Farning wrote:
Infrastructure meeting are (usually) on Fridays.
Except that I've been quite negligent in running them, and I'm afraid
I'm going to be offline next Friday too.
Let's reschedule when I'm back from Paris, or follow up by email.
--
// Bernie Innocenti
On 05/20/09 10:33, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Shall we re-adjust our schedule accordingly?
Sorry, my brain is broken. I parsed 11 as 12 and hit Send before
actually reading the full announcement.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
to fail tests silently and proceed
anyway using no as a command name in make :-)
If there's consensus on implementing one or more of these points, I can
provide patches (or just go on and commit them).
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
Anyone wants to take it over?
Original Message
Subject:Re: Reviving Sugarbot
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:58:40 -0400
From: Zach Riggle zachrig...@gmail.com
To: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
CC: Titus Brown ti...@idyll.org
Bernie
I am extremely busy
.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
the dependency check will fail if you don't have a
DISPLAY set does not mean too much for Windows people like me (I did
manage to google the answer so it was not a question).
You're right. Please, update the wiki with more information for newbies.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X
adding it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 05/22/09 20:18, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Support for Fedora 11 was missing in sysdeps. I pushed a patch adding
it.
Thanks! The way Fedora versioning works is starting to get annoying (I
had to add Fedora 10.93 just two weeks
.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
-200905212052_sayamindu_metacity.iso -boot d -m
1024M
I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu.
But it might be because qemu is broken in Fedora 11.
Anyway, good job!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
On 05/23/09 19:16, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu.
But it might be because qemu is broken in Fedora 11.
Oh, wait! It was just damn slow because I wasn't using kvm (permissions
issue).
Now I could test it, and it looks good, modulo
On 05/25/09 09:48, Brian Jordan wrote:
Is anyone against retiring the activit...@lists.laptop.org list in
favor of migration to sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org?
+1.
I think platform developers should be aware of the challenges of
activity writers, and vice-versa.
--
// Bernie Innocenti
On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB
RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about it.
Ugh. That's a ton for a wm :-( Are there alternatives
[cc += cwickert]
On 05/25/09 12:10, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB
RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about
.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
: linux
The same USB stick boots fine on any other computer I could find.
Does it seem like a syslinux bug? And if turns out to be a known BIOS
bug, is there a good workaround?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
On 06/02/09 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
221 heads, 2 sectors/track, 9081 cylinders
I don't know where fdisk, the Linux kernel, or whatever come up with
these kinds of geometries. They're almost universally non-bootable.
Ok
On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Ok, I wiped mbr and made fdisk create a new one:
Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
64 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1011 cylinders
^^
Equally weird. The only standard ones are 64 heads, 32
On 06/02/09 13:48, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Ok, I wiped mbr and made fdisk create a new one:
Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
64 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1011 cylinders
^^
Equally weird
.
Cool!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On 06/02/09 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes
221 heads, 2 sectors/track, 9081 cylinders
I don't know where fdisk, the Linux kernel, or whatever come up
On 06/04/09 20:51, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Equally weird. The only standard ones are 64 heads, 32 sectors and
255 heads, 63 sectors.
Indeed, repartitioning the USB stick with 32 sectors and 255 heads fixed
boot for a previously unbootable computer.
32x255? That's
mirroring.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
faster than than we can add deltas to our XO
bundle format. Or, we could reconsider our requirements and perform
system-wide instalations perhaps with --noscripts (which the xo bundles
don't support anyway).
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http
download!/a/td
/tr
/table
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
download!/a/td
/tr
/table
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
download!/a/td
/tr
/table
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
, build, and report back:
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-jhbuild/repos/streamlined
These instructions should be mostly still relevant:
http://wiki-testing.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Jhbuild
Patches welcome!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs
a complex
web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine.
I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I
believe.
Could you run jhbuild with a different uid, in a chroot environment, or
even in a virtual machine?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http
or within
sugar-jhbuild shell.
In jhbuild we need that so we can launch a second instance of the
gconf daemon in the jhbuild session bus.
Interesting, so maybe installing the GConf-dbus package in Jaunty will
work around those problems?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar
Thanks for reporting it.
We've been having a lot of trouble with Pootle lately. Possible
solutions are being discussed on the systems@ list, if you're interested
in the discussion.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
* for helping!
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
. The server should be
back up and running within a few minutes.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 19:49 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
The FSF admins are working on fixing the problem. The server should be
back up and running within a few minutes.
Sunjammer has been bought back up a few hours ago.
Anyone who would like to receive notifications regarding our servers
[cc += sugar-de...@]
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:25 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:31:13AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
And even then, rather than paying the pizzo (*) to the SSL mafia, we
coul create our own Sugar Labs CA and install our certificate in the
bundle
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:44 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:51:03AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
Sure, they're having (organisational) trouble again, but to be honest
I nevertheless trust them way more than any commercial CA.
I used to trust them more, but many
, administer
than trac and has a much more active community developing useful plugins
Does redmine solve the cases I described above?
Simon
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
Very interesting. We have a demo redmine instance here:
http://prj.sugarlabs.org/
Would you like to help configure it to give us an idea of how it would
work in practice?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:53 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
sure, i can work on it. i can try to put a couple hours into it
tomorrow.
You should have received login info by email.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:01 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 07:40 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:56 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote:
Would you like to help configure it to give us an idea of how it would
work in practice?
bernie: to be productive i
Mandoki
email = asa...@gmail.com
You can also make this a setting global by putting it in ~/.gitconfig.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
for registered users. If anyone
really needs it, they can ask for permission to one of our Trac admins:
bernie
codeeranger
bernie
coderanger
TRAC_ADMIN
erikos
TRAC_ADMIN
krstic
TRAC_ADMIN
marcopg
TRAC_ADMIN
tomeu
TRAC_ADMIN
wadeb
walter
TRAC_ADMIN
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http
Labs this month,
I would appreciate your help on maintaining and extending our Mediawiki.
Bothering me on IRC is usually the most effective way to get my
attention quickly.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
to start testing a simpler 6to4 scheme
and drop the AYIYA tunnel soon-ish.
We could also add IPv4 port forwarding for the VMs, but I expect that
6to4 won't be as unreliable as the sixxs.net service has been.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
El Sat, 08-08-2009 a las 18:00 +0200, Bernie Innocenti escribió:
We could also add IPv4 port forwarding for the VMs, but I expect that
6to4 won't be as unreliable as the sixxs.net service has been.
I added an A record for bender.sugarlabs.org alongside the existing
record.
Yesterday night
El Tue, 11-08-2009 a las 10:59 +0200, Simon Schampijer escribió:
@Infra-people, is it possible to get an own instance for soas?
Sure, but... does it really have to be Trac? :-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
rename it to sugar-utils and genericize it so it behaves nicely when not
running on the XO.
Are you the current maintainer of olpc-utils? I used to be, but now I
don't feel like I have enough spare cycles to work on it.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http
.
And isn't it funny how one company monopolizes *all* these vector
graphics standards that were supposed to compete with each other:
PostScript, PDF, Flash and SVG.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
tells them
to do.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
Javascript ;-)
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
without going through the ISDN nonsense that plagued
Europe for many years.
Will developing countries be lucky enough to skip MS Word and PDF too
and go directly to HTML and Wiki?
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
issues.
Apologies for any inconvenience,
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
to notify !sugarlabsstatus in advance before taking down
a public-facing service.
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http
will actually be rejected
instead. I have also cleared a huge queue of pending moderator
requests, discarding everything.
Sorry for the inconvenience,
Your lovely BOFH
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org
|| --reserved--||
--
// Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
\X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
1 - 100 of 744 matches
Mail list logo
