Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Allow view-source to launch external activities

2008-12-07 Thread Bernie Innocenti
to read and to quote. Also, this is what git-send-email does by default, and what git-am expects as input. Therefore, by following this convention you never have to leave your precious shell to exchange patches over email :-) -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs

Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG performance

2008-12-07 Thread Bernie Innocenti
() elapsed_time = end_time - start_time print elapsed_time -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG performance

2008-12-08 Thread Bernie Innocenti
much slower (loading? parsing? rendering?) and fix it, it would impact all of Sugar. This might be an interesting opportunity! Let me have a look this afternoon! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] SVG performance

2008-12-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
benchmarking between the two? I'm not sure we'd ever want to add a dependency on libagg and wxWindows, but it would give an idea of how good or bad our current stack is. The gnash folks, for instance, report huge performance gains by switching from cairo to antigrain. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org problem

2008-12-15 Thread Bernie Innocenti
@ list: it's been fixed a couple of days ago, but the rest of the traffic went through osuosl's RT. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] TurtleArt-24

2008-12-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti
for project names? Gitorious uses intentionally two separate names, the slug, which is a single lowercase word for the URL, and a pretty print project title. Bernie said you have an account. It is the one at shell.sugarlabs.org. Yes. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs

[Sugar-devel] [Fwd: [Systems] git.sugarlabs.org down?]

2008-12-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Forgot to notify sugar-devel@ Original Message Subject: [Systems] git.sugarlabs.org down? Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2008 12:45:17 -0500 From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org Organization: Sugar Labs Foundation - http://sugarlabs.org/ To: OSU-OSL Support supp...@osuosl.org CC: Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] location for common web files

2009-01-17 Thread Bernie Innocenti
domain for shared static content and put it on sunjammer. How does it sound? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

[Sugar-devel] sugar-jhbuild in Gitorious

2009-01-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
while rendering the main project page. The errant user_id belonged to a user who got locked out and had asked to be deleted. Now we know to be careful not to break referential integrity if we ever need to hack the database again :-) -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Walter Bender wrote: Wow!! We have great release notes lately. To credit authors, I'd also append the patch summary by author, Linus-style. It can quickly be obtained this way: git log v0.83.3..HEAD | git-shortlog -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
it looks super ugly in the subject of an email. - To reduce clutter, I'd make the SL prefix implied, and leave other prefixes such as OLPC#123 and RH#456 explicit. Do we have a wiki page where we can document these practices? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
that for packages only maintained upstream at Sugarlabs there is no need to add it to eah and eery bug hint. I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch to using the Closes: header in the body, where we have no size constraints, then we could has well use the prefix consistently. -- // Bernie

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.83.4 Development Release

2009-01-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Martin Langhoff wrote: On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: I meant it should have been optional, but if we switch to using the Closes: header in the body, where we have no size constraints, then we could has well use the prefix consistently. One

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
to the size of the file. Writeable file mappings are just not supported by jffs2, and cause mmap() to return an error. glibc likes to do it when building the locale-archive, and I vaguely remember I had a workaround for this in our fork of the glibc rpm. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
workarounds is going to cost a lot of time. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
it was fixed, but apparently not. I'll check and let you know. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo

Re: [Sugar-devel] status of OLPC project

2009-01-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Bernie Innocenti wrote: [cc += sugar-de...@] Victor Lazzarini wrote: Thanks. Walter has kindly replied to me already, so it looks like sugar labs is my destination. Hope to be able to clear up all my marking by the end of next week and by then I think will also know where I actually fit

Re: [Sugar-devel] Naming of sugar, the Sugar Shell

2009-01-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
the same proposal on the marketing list. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Naming of sugar, the Sugar Shell

2009-01-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
not been shipped as an independent module and there are no plans to do so. Or does that mean that you have to split it out to a separate package in order to comply with this D.P.P.? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] OLPC Afghanistan first pilot school

2009-01-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
:) What version of the XO builds is being deployed? With what base activities? The page says that the technical team will develop new activities. We would like to stay in contact with the developers on IRC and on the sugar-devel mailing list. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] sugar not depending on gnomevfs any more

2009-02-01 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Sugar has replaced in 0.83.x where it used gnomevfs with GIO, so we can drop that dependency. Kudos! Sugar is loosing bloat so quickly that, at this rate, it will disappear by 1.0. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http

[Sugar-devel] What is a blocker bug today?

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
, or something like that. I'd also like to discuss how our time-based releases relate with the need to fix all blockers before a release. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Soas Distribution/OS

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
it quickly, thanks. Done, although not quickly, sorry. The Distribution/OS is in the section [ticket-custom] of trac.ini, and admittedly the web interface does not provide a way to edit it. Maybe Noah knows why? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is a blocker bug today?

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Unspecified. I thought I had configured it like that a lot of time ago. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] A small request.

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Bernie Innocenti wrote: Another issue is how we integrate the updater with addons.sl.o. Because the OLPC microformat is trivial, it might be easy to modify the remora's html output to be compatible with it. Mick, Tomeu and David, who have had a closer look at the code, might want to comment

Re: [Sugar-devel] A small request.

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
with addons.sl.o as a backend. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Activity updater

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
the mantra of doing only what nobody else is already doing. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is a blocker bug today?

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: I guess at some point the default was Blocker, because there lots of tickets marked that way in trac. Yeah, we should re-prioritize them. Do we have a Bugmaster role? We should /me steps back... quickly! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X

Re: [Sugar-devel] Service announcement scheme - (Re: A small request.)

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
don't trust any given individual to be able to do a good job without going through an *extensive* iterative design process with public reviews of interim drafts. What's hardest about networking is that it looks deceptively easy at first :-) -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X

Re: [Sugar-devel] Service announcement scheme - (Re: A small request.)

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
on a nameserver running on the XS? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Service announcement scheme - (Re: A small request.)

2009-02-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
the event only after the state has settled for a certain amount of time. This would take away a certain percentage of spurious updates, but the number basically remains proportional to the number of users so it doesn't scale much better. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fedora 10 machine to build soas-1 images

2009-02-11 Thread Bernie Innocenti
with paravirtualized kernels. Our sugarlabs4.xen.prgmr.com machine is already using it. Ask dfarning for access to it while I'm still traveling around. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar

[Sugar-devel] Build intrastructure

2009-02-11 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] A small request.

2009-02-11 Thread Bernie Innocenti
the actual status. Mick? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org difficulties

2009-02-16 Thread Bernie Innocenti
/authorized_keys. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org difficulties

2009-02-18 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Martin Langhoff wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: You should be using gitorious@ rather than vepla...@. Yes, it's awkward, but it's explained somewhere on the repository page. Internally, gitorious dispatches individual users by means

Re: [Sugar-devel] git.sugarlabs.org difficulties

2009-02-19 Thread Bernie Innocenti
to the gitorious machine too (a waste of time since you cannot log anywhere else anyway). Though I would swear I was able last week. Check $SSK_AUTH_SOCK from sunjammer, and try ssh-add -l to ensure that your keys are still available. Works for me. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Reduce default emulator resolution to 1024x768

2009-02-19 Thread Bernie Innocenti
have hard-coded or special-cased the new default in their code. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Permissions to upload honey sources

2009-02-24 Thread Bernie Innocenti
packaging addons in distros, but if there's any chance they want to support source tarballs, we'll get that support for free. Indeed! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar

[Sugar-devel] Mailing list moderators needed

2009-02-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. This way, at least, we don't set the expectations of those few human posters too high. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Mailing list moderators needed

2009-02-26 Thread Bernie Innocenti
that! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Full Licence field

2009-02-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
conversion. Where does the bundle specification live these days? Last time I've read it, it was still on wiki.laptop.org. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [ANNOUNCE] Sucrose 0.84.0 Final Release

2009-03-05 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 03/05/09 10:56, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: So, how are we going to celebrate it? As 0.84.1 is going to be on, we could do a bug fix sprint during a weekend. Should we get the marketing team to prepare a press release? Did we announce it on Freshmeat? Slashdot? LWN? OLPCNews? -- // Bernie

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Buildslaves cleanup

2009-03-07 Thread Bernie Innocenti
David Farning wrote: Nice, Are they running on a new machine at PGRMR? Not yet. I pinged the prgmr.com folks about it. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing

[Sugar-devel] [Fwd: Re: [rt.prgmr.com #311] sugarlabs1 routing problem]

2009-03-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
or two while the disk is copied. I'll email you again before I do it. Thanks. Nick Schmalenberger -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Video chat contact

2009-03-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
://dev.laptop.org/git/projects/video-chat-activity/ -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://www.codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://www.sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Marketing] [IAEP] personal marketing (bottum up approach)

2009-05-19 Thread Bernie Innocenti
just didn't get around to do it. Please, file a ticket for me so I don't forget. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] [Marketing] personal marketing (bottum up approach)

2009-05-19 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 05/19/09 16:34, David Farning wrote: Infrastructure meeting are (usually) on Fridays. Except that I've been quite negligent in running them, and I'm afraid I'm going to be offline next Friday too. Let's reschedule when I'm back from Paris, or follow up by email. -- // Bernie Innocenti

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: One week slip of Fedora 11 Release

2009-05-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 05/20/09 10:33, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Shall we re-adjust our schedule accordingly? Sorry, my brain is broken. I parsed 11 as 12 and hit Send before actually reading the full announcement. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] Simplifying sugar-jhbuild

2009-05-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
to fail tests silently and proceed anyway using no as a command name in make :-) If there's consensus on implementing one or more of these points, I can provide patches (or just go on and commit them). -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Re: Reviving Sugarbot

2009-05-20 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Anyone wants to take it over? Original Message Subject:Re: Reviving Sugarbot Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:58:40 -0400 From: Zach Riggle zachrig...@gmail.com To: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org CC: Titus Brown ti...@idyll.org Bernie I am extremely busy

Re: [Sugar-devel] Simplifying sugar-jhbuild

2009-05-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Simplifying sugar-jhbuild

2009-05-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Simplifying sugar-jhbuild

2009-05-21 Thread Bernie Innocenti
the dependency check will fail if you don't have a DISPLAY set does not mean too much for Windows people like me (I did manage to google the answer so it was not a question). You're right. Please, update the wiki with more information for newbies. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X

Re: [Sugar-devel] Simplifying sugar-jhbuild

2009-05-22 Thread Bernie Innocenti
adding it. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Simplifying sugar-jhbuild

2009-05-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 05/22/09 20:18, Sascha Silbe wrote: On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 03:45:04PM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Support for Fedora 11 was missing in sysdeps. I pushed a patch adding it. Thanks! The way Fedora versioning works is starting to get annoying (I had to add Fedora 10.93 just two weeks

[Sugar-devel] Streamlined jhbuild

2009-05-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar with Metacity (again)

2009-05-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
-200905212052_sayamindu_metacity.iso -boot d -m 1024M I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu. But it might be because qemu is broken in Fedora 11. Anyway, good job! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar with Metacity (again)

2009-05-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 05/23/09 19:16, Bernie Innocenti wrote: I couldn't get this to boot, it hangs some time after the grub menu. But it might be because qemu is broken in Fedora 11. Oh, wait! It was just damn slow because I wasn't using kvm (permissions issue). Now I could test it, and it looks good, modulo

Re: [Sugar-devel] greater activities list by deleting activities list

2009-05-25 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 05/25/09 09:48, Brian Jordan wrote: Is anyone against retiring the activit...@lists.laptop.org list in favor of migration to sugar-de...@lists.sugarlabs.org? +1. I think platform developers should be aware of the challenges of activity writers, and vice-versa. -- // Bernie Innocenti

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar with Metacity (again)

2009-05-25 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about it. Ugh. That's a ton for a wm :-( Are there alternatives

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar with Metacity (again)

2009-05-25 Thread Bernie Innocenti
[cc += cwickert] On 05/25/09 12:10, Bernie Innocenti wrote: On 05/25/09 11:19, Martin Langhoff wrote: On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: The only thing I didn't like very much is memory usage: 21MB VIRT, 10MB RSS. But I suppose we can't do much about

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar with Metacity (again)

2009-05-25 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-05-31 Thread Bernie Innocenti
: linux The same USB stick boots fine on any other computer I could find. Does it seem like a syslinux bug? And if turns out to be a known BIOS bug, is there a good workaround? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-06-01 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/02/09 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bernie Innocenti wrote: Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes 221 heads, 2 sectors/track, 9081 cylinders I don't know where fdisk, the Linux kernel, or whatever come up with these kinds of geometries. They're almost universally non-bootable. Ok

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-06-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bernie Innocenti wrote: Ok, I wiped mbr and made fdisk create a new one: Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes 64 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1011 cylinders ^^ Equally weird. The only standard ones are 64 heads, 32

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-06-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/02/09 13:48, Bernie Innocenti wrote: On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bernie Innocenti wrote: Ok, I wiped mbr and made fdisk create a new one: Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes 64 heads, 62 sectors/track, 1011 cylinders ^^ Equally weird

Re: [Sugar-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Email announcements from activities.sugarlabs.org

2009-06-04 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. Cool! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-06-04 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/02/09 07:10, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bernie Innocenti wrote: On 06/02/09 03:43, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bernie Innocenti wrote: Disk /dev/sdb: 2055 MB, 2055208960 bytes 221 heads, 2 sectors/track, 9081 cylinders I don't know where fdisk, the Linux kernel, or whatever come up

Re: [Sugar-devel] Unbootable machine

2009-06-04 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On 06/04/09 20:51, H. Peter Anvin wrote: Bernie Innocenti wrote: Equally weird. The only standard ones are 64 heads, 32 sectors and 255 heads, 63 sectors. Indeed, repartitioning the USB stick with 32 sectors and 255 heads fixed boot for a previously unbootable computer. 32x255? That's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem using sugar-update-control to update large (100+ MB) activity bundles

2009-06-15 Thread Bernie Innocenti
mirroring. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem using sugar-update-control to update large (100+ MB) activity bundles

2009-06-16 Thread Bernie Innocenti
faster than than we can add deltas to our XO bundle format. Or, we could reconsider our requirements and perform system-wide instalations perhaps with --noscripts (which the xo bundles don't support anyway). -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem using sugar-update-control to update large (100+ MB) activity bundles

2009-06-16 Thread Bernie Innocenti
download!/a/td /tr /table -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem using sugar-update-control to update large (100+ MB) activity bundles

2009-06-16 Thread Bernie Innocenti
download!/a/td /tr /table -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Problem using sugar-update-control to update large (100+ MB) activity bundles

2009-06-16 Thread Bernie Innocenti
download!/a/td /tr /table -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-18 Thread Bernie Innocenti
, build, and report back: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/sugar-jhbuild/repos/streamlined These instructions should be mostly still relevant: http://wiki-testing.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Jhbuild Patches welcome! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-19 Thread Bernie Innocenti
a complex web-interacting script like jhbuild to run on my machine. I run packaged software. Risky too, but cutting the wildest edges, I believe. Could you run jhbuild with a different uid, in a chroot environment, or even in a virtual machine? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
are we even using this GConf crap? Simple ini files were too easy to work with?!? ;-/ -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Testing streamlined sugar-jhbuild

2009-06-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
or within sugar-jhbuild shell. In jhbuild we need that so we can launch a second instance of the gconf daemon in the jhbuild session bus. Interesting, so maybe installing the GConf-dbus package in Jaunty will work around those problems? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] http://translate.sugarlabs.org/ down again

2009-06-23 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Thanks for reporting it. We've been having a lot of trouble with Pootle lately. Possible solutions are being discussed on the systems@ list, if you're interested in the discussion. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Introduction and question about introducing Sugar development

2009-06-28 Thread Bernie Innocenti
* for helping! -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Sunjammer down for unplanned maintenance

2009-07-01 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. The server should be back up and running within a few minutes. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Sunjammer down for unplanned maintenance

2009-07-01 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 19:49 +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: The FSF admins are working on fixing the problem. The server should be back up and running within a few minutes. Sunjammer has been bought back up a few hours ago. Anyone who would like to receive notifications regarding our servers

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Enabling https://translate.sugarlabs.org

2009-07-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
[cc += sugar-de...@] On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:25 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 06:31:13AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: And even then, rather than paying the pizzo (*) to the SSL mafia, we coul create our own Sugar Labs CA and install our certificate in the bundle

Re: [Sugar-devel] CACert in Browse (was: Re: [Systems] Enabling https://translate.sugarlabs.org)

2009-07-02 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 12:44 +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote: On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:51:03AM +0200, Bernie Innocenti wrote: Sure, they're having (organisational) trouble again, but to be honest I nevertheless trust them way more than any commercial CA. I used to trust them more, but many

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug tracker enhancements

2009-07-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
, administer than trac and has a much more active community developing useful plugins Does redmine solve the cases I described above? Simon -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug tracker enhancements

2009-07-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Very interesting. We have a demo redmine instance here: http://prj.sugarlabs.org/ Would you like to help configure it to give us an idea of how it would work in practice? -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug tracker enhancements

2009-07-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 17:53 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote: sure, i can work on it. i can try to put a couple hours into it tomorrow. You should have received login info by email. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug tracker enhancements

2009-07-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 18:01 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 07:40 -0400, Bernie Innocenti wrote: On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 16:56 +0545, Bryan Berry wrote: Would you like to help configure it to give us an idea of how it would work in practice? bernie: to be productive i

Re: [Sugar-devel] Commiter problem with git

2009-07-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Mandoki email = asa...@gmail.com You can also make this a setting global by putting it in ~/.gitconfig. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Commiter problem with git

2009-07-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
-- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Trac wiki becomes read-only

2009-08-07 Thread Bernie Innocenti
for registered users. If anyone really needs it, they can ask for permission to one of our Trac admins: bernie codeeranger bernie coderanger TRAC_ADMIN erikos TRAC_ADMIN krstic TRAC_ADMIN marcopg TRAC_ADMIN tomeu TRAC_ADMIN wadeb walter TRAC_ADMIN -- // Bernie Innocenti - http

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] Trac wiki becomes read-only

2009-08-07 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Labs this month, I would appreciate your help on maintaining and extending our Mediawiki. Bothering me on IRC is usually the most effective way to get my attention quickly. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] bender: new uplink change of IP, Aug 8 18:30 CEST

2009-08-08 Thread Bernie Innocenti
to start testing a simpler 6to4 scheme and drop the AYIYA tunnel soon-ish. We could also add IPv4 port forwarding for the VMs, but I expect that 6to4 won't be as unreliable as the sixxs.net service has been. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [Systems] bender: new uplink change of IP, Aug 8 18:30 CEST

2009-08-09 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Sat, 08-08-2009 a las 18:00 +0200, Bernie Innocenti escribió: We could also add IPv4 port forwarding for the VMs, but I expect that 6to4 won't be as unreliable as the sixxs.net service has been. I added an A record for bender.sugarlabs.org alongside the existing record. Yesterday night

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug tracker enhancements

2009-08-11 Thread Bernie Innocenti
El Tue, 11-08-2009 a las 10:59 +0200, Simon Schampijer escribió: @Infra-people, is it possible to get an own instance for soas? Sure, but... does it really have to be Trac? :-) -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Re: #1157 HIGH: Show which jabber server to which you are connected

2009-08-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
rename it to sugar-utils and genericize it so it behaves nicely when not running on the XO. Are you the current maintainer of olpc-utils? I used to be, but now I don't feel like I have enough spare cycles to work on it. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http

Re: [Sugar-devel] Deployment feedback braindump

2009-08-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
. And isn't it funny how one company monopolizes *all* these vector graphics standards that were supposed to compete with each other: PostScript, PDF, Flash and SVG. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Deployment feedback braindump

2009-08-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
tells them to do. -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Deployment feedback braindump

2009-08-12 Thread Bernie Innocenti
Javascript ;-) -- // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/ \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >