Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] FudCon January 2009

2008-12-05 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Tomeu Vizoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, do we have any new Sugar features to add to F11 other than Sugar 0.84? Some areas I can think of: - server pieces like backup, etc - fast user switching - better integration with other desktops, for example by using

Re: [Sugar-devel] Release tool

2008-12-05 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Morgan Collett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure... but by then the commits with the #1234 are already done and pushed... Making it clear in the tool would help for anyone who hadn't noticed. I guess they can clean up the release notice manually at that point.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Missed icons in sugar-artwork

2008-12-05 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Maybe Eben can make an icon for it? Marco On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Aleksey Lim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I'm packaging sugar and found out that Calculate(sugar-artwork) hasn't edit-cut.svg. There are two 3-months bugs on dev.laptop.org #7939 and #8296 - I see thats no a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Cairo performance (was Re: SVG performance)

2008-12-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:44 AM, Wade Brainerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm assuming that these SVGs are rendered at initialization time into bitmaps using Cairo. But either way, I think there is a big performance problem with Cairo on the XO. I see it again and again in my activities, so far

[Sugar-devel] New official repos

2008-12-15 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
The official repositories for the following modules has moved on git.sugarlabs.org: sugar sugar-base sugar-toolkit sugar-datastore sugar-presense-service sugar-jhbuild read chat Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar-Developers meeting REMINDER (December 18, 2008 - 14.00 (UTC)) --- irc.freenode.net, #sugar-meeting

2008-12-18 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:20 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Hello, tomorrows agenda is going through the TODO list [1] and see which items we have fixed already. So you better make your home work :) And these two items are left from last week: 1) developer items for the

Re: [Sugar-devel] XOCamp in Cambridge January 12 - 16

2008-12-19 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:50 PM, Greg Smith gregsmitho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, The XOCamp schedule and plan is coming together. See the updated schedule here: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XOCamp_2 Sign up if you are coming here: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XOCamp_2#Attendees I put a spot

Re: [Sugar-devel] [RELEASE] Jukebox v6 released

2008-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Could you please rename the git repository to jukebox (lowercase), for consistency with the other activities? Thanks, Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

[Sugar-devel] Activity packaging problems

2008-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, I listed all the problems I'm aware of, which are currently blocking activities packaging: http://sugarlabs.org/go/DevelopmentTeam/Activities_packaging If you are packaging activities and you run into any (non distribution specific) issue, please add to the list. Marco

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity packaging problems

2008-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:35 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: A common issue (so not sure how to best apply it) is copyright and licensing info for translations. Added a note about it. Thanks! Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Request for help packaging activities for Sugar on a Stick

2008-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Martin Sevior msev...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Caroline, I clicked on the various links to see the status of Write but I couldn't see anything. Is it already on SoaS? Yup, it is! Marco ___ Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Request for help packaging activities for Sugar on a Stick

2008-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:38 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: Hi Caroline, But Sugar without activities is boring!! We need you and your activities! Please help us get activities quickly ported to Sugar on a Stick, we have a lot of people pounding on our doors to try it.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity packaging problems

2008-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: Ahem, either you misunderstood or somehow misunderstand your response: My fault. I thought you was talking about my changes in the wiki, which also needed to be fixed anyway. I do not suggest to change anything at

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity packaging problems

2008-12-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:43 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Please keep these points coming. Last release, Sugar's only active downstream was OLPC. This release we will be acting as upstreams, directly or indirectly, for OLPC, Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Mandriva, and a few

Re: [Sugar-devel] XOCamp in Cambridge January 12 - 16

2009-01-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Greg Smith gregsmitho...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Maroc, I moved it to Monday at 3PM. I hope you and Simon can make it. That sounds right re: agenda. I expanded it a little and put it here: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XOCamp_2#Sugar_Synch_Up Add and edit as

Re: [Sugar-devel] Activity page wiki location?

2009-01-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Morgan Collett morgan.coll...@gmail.com wrote: I think Gary's question was (and if not, certainly mine is): Where should we be documenting, or project-managing, the activity development? For example, http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Chat - should this migrate to

[Sugar-devel] Gitorious groups

2009-01-13 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Interesting comment by Johan on my blog: http://www.marcopg.org/2008/12/17/gitorious-switness/#comment-7 Yay! Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #1: icon cache

2009-01-17 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Benjamin Berg benja...@sipsolutions.net wrote: Advantages: * One mmaped cache, that is shared between activities (and file backed). * Cached icons work for *any* color combination Disadvantages: * If the correct size is not in the cache, the icon need

Re: [Sugar-devel] feature freeze issue #2: making easier for people to title their activities

2009-01-17 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
My suggestion would be to keep developing it until we have something we are satisfied about from the user experience point of view. Then we can make a call about risk. If we complete in the next few days I'd expect it's something we will want to land. Marco

Re: [Sugar-devel] Extensive jhbuild refactoring landed

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:38 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: slo-buildbot is removed. It will take a couple for the change to propagate through the buildbot network Can you also remove sugar-buildbot from git.sl.org? I'll make it deprecated, would like to keep the sources

[Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, I spent some time trying to get Sugar on a stick images (which are basically livecd-tools based Fedora spins) running on the XO from nand. Converting the image to jffs2 and adding cafe_nand and jffs2 to the initrd was enough to make it boot. I have two weird problems: 1 haldaemon fails

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: sugar-jhbuild

2009-01-21 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: I find it's most effective to run Sugar in a VM or second machine (XO for example). Then I can use any editor I want (Komodo is my preference for Python) to remotely edit files over a SFTP connection. Yeah, my point is

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-21 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
1 haldaemon fails to start and I couldn't find any error log. Maybe running it directly, rather than via init, will expose the problem? When running it directly it was sitting for a while and then exiting without any error (even in verbose mode). I should strace it. It looks like you're

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: I'm still not able to get the images I create to boot on the XO -- could you confirm that you're using the Fedora kernel and initrd? Yup, sure. The only difference is that the initrd contains more modules, because of the

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Yay, stock F10 is now running GNOME fine. Some more things I found: * I was not using -a when copying the files, so owners and all kind of other stuff was not preserved. That's the cause of the hal failure, new script attached. * With selinux enabled you cannot login from the console. Perhaps

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:42 PM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: * rpm does not work. It complains about mmap failure when reading the db, jffs2 related? As far as I know, jffs2 doesn't support

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: D'oh, I think OLPC asked Warren to push that X driver update, and it sounds like we didn't test it properly. Is there a good way to select which version of an RPM to use in kickstart, maybe? Which package are you referring to

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: D'oh, I think OLPC asked Warren to push that X driver update, and it sounds like we didn't test it properly. Is there a good way to select

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS on the XO progress

2009-01-24 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote: D'oh, I think OLPC asked Warren to push that X driver update, and it sounds like we didn't test it properly. Is there a good way to select

Re: [Sugar-devel] infrastructure mailing list

2009-01-26 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: I have a developer who has been unable to push to Gitorious using his SSH key. It was working two weeks ago, then suddenly stopped. We have sent emails to Bernie but have not gotten any real attention to the issue. Can

Re: [Sugar-devel] [olpc-nz] Hints for a Sugar dev intro?

2009-01-26 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: I've been doing my best to collect information on getting started here. http://sugarlabs.org/go/ActivityTeam/Resources Note that it's focused on activity development. This looks pretty good, Wade. Thanks for putting it

[Sugar-devel] Soas snapshot

2009-01-27 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
You can download the iso here: http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/snapshots/1/Soas-200901271941.iso Instructions on how to install it are here: http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick I also made an experimental image for the XO. It's not signed, so you will need security disabled, if you

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-01-30 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg g...@redhat.com wrote: So. If someone can point me to the *authoritative iso image* that we want to use for SoaS, I will make sure that we have install stations at the Fedora booth at FOSDEM. The latest known to work is:

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-01-31 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Latest image and improvements (git head with some fixes) are listed in this post http://erikos.sweettimez.de/?p=332 It is even a bit smaller :) Now, we really need to make this as small as possible. I wonder how we

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-01-31 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Why do you think size is very important for Soas (real question)? If we want wide testing and people need to download 800MB each time, many people (me included) will have a hard time getting those bits. But you don't

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-01-31 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: Well, it's mainly as small as it is due to removals regarding locals and drivers, but if you don't mind, I could also quickly draft up a kickstart file including GNOME and Sugar, wihch is not limited to the XO. I'd

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-01-31 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: Ok, did not think about yum update. Did not know GNOME was a requirement, wonder if this is a benefit to have though. I mean it is Sugar on a stick in the end. If it helps to make mac users get to know gnome or sugar

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-01-31 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 4:53 PM, David Van Assche dvanass...@gmail.com wrote: You can easily make gdm the session manager from which to choose sugar or gnome, and thereby give them access to gimp, inkscape and whatever other apps... gdm was eating quite a bit of memory last time I tried. Also

Re: [Sugar-devel] A small request.

2009-01-31 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote: Dear Sugar team, I've been very confused (and frankly, significantly angered) by recent remarks that I've encountered both in person (e.g. from Bernie) and in #sugar (e.g. from Simon and Tomeu) about how sugar-related

Re: [Sugar-devel] A small request.

2009-01-31 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:26 AM, C. Scott Ananian csc...@laptop.org wrote: Can someone tell me what it is we are discussing? We need to integrate some kind of activity updating solution in Glucose. There is disagreement on when (0.84 or next release cycle) and what (your updater, something based

[Sugar-devel] Soas Distribution/OS

2009-02-01 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Can we add Soas as one of the field alternatives? Couldn't quickly figure out how to do it myself... Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] How to move on? Spins, SoaS, and more!

2009-02-01 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Sebastian Dziallas sebast...@when.com wrote: But regarding the Education Spin: Couldn't we push Sugar in there? The KDE project is doing a great job with their applications regarding education, and they continue to do so. Recently, Greg made me aware of this

Re: [Sugar-devel] [OBORONA-SPAM] Re: sugar-widgets request

2009-02-02 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Aleksey Lim alsr...@member.fsf.org wrote: I mean new sugar-widgets package should use only public activity API, something like a current-sugar's-version-independent link between sugar and activities (mostly honey activities). That's pretty much what

Re: [Sugar-devel] What is a blocker bug today?

2009-02-02 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
A bugsquad even! Reprioritized most of mine yesterday... Marco On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: I guess at some point the default was Blocker, because there lots of tickets marked that way in trac. Yeah, we should re

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS at FOSDEM

2009-02-03 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: I tried it by hand yesterday and added our sugar repo to the yum config does work fine. The question is how we create that file now. We could do it in the kickstart file - but maybe there are other options? You could

[Sugar-devel] Fedora 10 machine to build soas-1 images

2009-02-05 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hello, do we have any F10 machine we can use to build Soas? sugarlabs1 has an old kernel, which prevents me to build XO images. I'll likely need sudo on it. Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

[Sugar-devel] Another Soas image for the XO

2009-02-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Now with readable fonts :) http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/soas3.crc http://download.sugarlabs.org/soas/xoimages/soas3.img Next challenge will be to trim the size down. I think Sebastian has been working on that. Marco ___ Sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Cannot sugar-jhbuild update

2009-02-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:47 PM, David Farning dfarn...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Thanks for finding this. Indeed, Gnome must have recently moved the location of jhbuild in their git repo. A couple of weeks ago there was a poll at Gnome about changing their VCS to git. The changes to the gnome

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Can you send ~/.sugar/default/logs/shell.log? Marco On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Alex Holkner alex.holk...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks for the previous help in getting sugar-jhbuild updating from the correct git repository. I've now got a successful install (this involved upgrading to Ubuntu

Re: [Sugar-devel] Fwd: Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Is this a clean jhbuild? Do you have sugar-jhbuild/install/libexec/gconfd-2 ? Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Please try the following: ./sugar-jhbuild shell python import gconf find out the python process pid cat /proc/[pid]/maps | grep gconf Thanks, Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:59:16PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: cat /proc/[pid]/maps | grep gconf 7fd77a69b000-7fd77a6d3000 r-xp 08:01 355522 /usr/lib/libgconf-2.so.4.1.5 7fd77a6d3000

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:59:16PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: cat /proc/[pid]/maps | grep gconf 7fd77a69b000

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 03:32:23PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: This is why it's failing... It should use the libgconf inside sugar-jhbuild/install. Then why does config/sysdeps/ubuntu-8.10.xml list

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hmmm I suspect some x86_64 weirdness. Alex, are you also on x86_64? Sascha, can you try to install the 64 bit version of python-gconf and see if it helps? I must say I have no idea if Ubuntu is multilib

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: I suppose python-gconf has been compiled using the -rpath option. Don't know how to dump the rpath setting, but the library does contain the string /usr/lib so it seems likely. Could be. If someone knows how

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: The other option is to use system GConf, but that also is quite painful because the ORBit version of it is not really jhbuild config (If I remember correctly we would have to ask people to mess with /etc to get

Re: [Sugar-devel] Getting sugar-jhbuild run working

2009-02-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 05:24:53PM +0100, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote: On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-ui-sugar-de...@silbe.org wrote: I suppose python

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar now has smoke test procedures.

2009-02-22 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Mel Chua m...@melchua.com wrote: Because of the impending 0.84 release and the need to have a simple answer to the question does build X work? Colin, Elsa, and I came up with http://sugarlabs.org/go/Smoke_test. It is meant to be a 20min does this build work?

Re: [Sugar-devel] SoaS - Another Snapshot

2009-02-22 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Awesome stuff! Let's make sure to update the link on the wiki page when announcing a new image. http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick#Fedora_based_Sugar_on_a_Stick (I'm removing a comment there about checking people blogs to figure out the latest one, because that seem complicated/unreliable

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar now has smoke test procedures.

2009-02-22 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: We have instructions for SoaS. The whole page could use some cleanups. In particular we should not mix different distributions in the same page imo and we should expand the linux section. But it's a start

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar now has smoke test procedures.

2009-02-22 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: We have instructions for SoaS. The whole page could use some cleanups. In particular we should not mix different distributions

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SoaS - moving onward...

2009-02-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Wade Brainerd wad...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, this link appears to have disappeared. I updated http://sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_on_a_Stick to focus on downloading and writing this distribution to a USB stick.  Other aspects of SoaS were moved down to the TODO links.

Re: [Sugar-devel] [IAEP] SoaS - moving onward...

2009-02-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti marc...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I'd like to standardize on a *single* program for creating USB keys, preferrably the Fedora LiveUSB Creator.  Can anyone try this out on Linux and report back whether it works?  If it indeed does, I'll move

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Touchpad extension for the frame

2010-07-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 8 Jul 2010, at 17:23, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: --- extensions/deviceicon/touchpad.py | 152 + 1 files changed, 152 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 extensions/deviceicon/touchpad.py diff --git

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Touchpad extension for the frame

2010-07-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
In general, this looks olpc specific right now, but I think it's fine to have it upstream, we can abstract it more later if we need to support different hardware. It's a while I don't code or review Sugar patches so I might very well be missing things... And I can't really test the patch right

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH 3/3] Touchpad extension for the frame

2010-07-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Should be squashed with patch 2, to keep the tree functional. On 8 Jul 2010, at 17:24, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: --- icons/scalable/device/Makefile.am |4 +++- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/icons/scalable/device/Makefile.am

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH 1/3] Touchpad extension for the frame

2010-07-09 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 9 Jul 2010, at 05:58, Walter Bender walter.ben...@gmail.com wrote: +from gettext import gettext as _ + +import gtk +import gconf +import os Move the os import to the first block :) Nice work! Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

[Sugar-devel] Evince browser plugin

2010-07-27 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Hi Lucian, sorry for the long delay, here is the git repository with the evince browser plugin. http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/evince-browser-plugin The changes are on the plugin branch. It builds and seems to work fine for me in Lucid. Unfortunately it's still based on 2.25... I haven't

Re: [Sugar-devel] update on the collaboration refactoring

2010-08-03 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.co.uk wrote: Activities using the sugar.presence API in sugar-toolkit should require no changes Is the long term plan to deprecate sugar.presence and have activities interact directly with telepathy? Marco

Re: [Sugar-devel] update on the collaboration refactoring

2010-08-03 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.co.uk wrote: Yes, Collabora is working on higher level APIs in telepathy-glib that will be exposed through introspection and Canonical is exploring similar APIs as part of the Quickly widgets library. Sounds great! Marco

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-05 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 6 Aug 2010, at 00:20, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote: On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote: Another option is having some script that adds committers to all sugar core modules in one go, that would be similar to what GNOME does. There are too many core

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:05 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Yeah, I think we need to look into merging core in a single repository. At the end it's basically the same problem we find again and again: we spend days-person discussing some big changes, eventually may reach an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Adding committers on gitorious (was: Re: [PATCH] Remove nbsp chars from the html string before parsing)

2010-08-07 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 6 Aug 2010, at 13:35, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I was just throwing in the idea here. I will bother you further only once I have a realistic plan in mind (and confidence in the ability to execute it with our limited resources) :) Sorry if I sounded harsh, I wanted to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-07 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 7 Aug 2010, at 21:08, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote: Just killing a random activity is a terrible idea becayse you don't want your product behaving like it's defective; the pop up idea is way more acceptable(and a lot better than having the system randomly behaving like it's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Sent from my iPad On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:40, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote: Just killing a random activity is a terrible idea becayse you don't want your product behaving like it's defective; the pop up idea is way more acceptable(and a lot better than having the system randomly

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 8 Aug 2010, at 18:40, Tiago Marques tiago...@gmail.com wrote: The idea of killing activities with the content closed seems ok but it would probably be a good idea to have a way to opt out of it for some apps. I'm thinking a PDF that may be left open on purpose to serve as reference to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 8 Aug 2010, at 20:38, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Imo a confirmation popup would become annoying very quickly. Also if the user refuses, the kernel will have soon to kill an activity, which is worst. Activities already write_file when they lose focus, they could

Re: [Sugar-devel] Killing activities when memory gets short

2010-08-08 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 8 Aug 2010, at 20:57, Lucian Branescu lucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote: Separating the activity from the service would help here. In the case of music, MPD would use a lot less memory than one of its GUIs. Right, I was thinking to something along these lines too. I'm not sure how the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Remove Presence Service

2010-08-16 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
I don't have enough time for a very detailed review and I don't really know telepathy, but here a few comments. Mostly nitpicks, it looks great in general. +BuddyIcon.__init__(self, buddy=get_owner_instance(), size=size) Maybe assign to self._buddy here and reuse later to pass to the

Re: [Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Remove Presence Service

2010-08-17 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Tomeu Vizoso tomeu.viz...@collabora.co.uk wrote: I still think we should move away from GObject for non UI stuff :) Agreed, but as above I think it should be a cleanup goal rather than having feature patches fixing it bit by bit. Sure, I agree. Marco

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Use GNOME_COMPILE_WARNINGS

2010-08-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi, for which module is this patch? Heh, sorry, I somehow assumed sugar-artwork would appear in the patch... Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing list Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar-artwork] Remove unused CFLAGS and LIBS

2010-08-23 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 02:04,  ma...@marcopg.org wrote: From: Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org ---  configure.ac |    5 -  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug tracking Vs Patch review

2010-09-01 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
Guys, honestly this whole discussion is getting a bit ridiculous, lots of rhetoric and very little practical disagreement. We agree that we should try out reviews on the mailing list, let's just do it. I'm pretty confident we can setup and improve patchwork to help us tracking patch status

Re: [Sugar-devel] Patch review, combining/splitting modules (was: Re: Patch review)

2010-09-02 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 2 Sep 2010, at 21:21, Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-201...@silbe.org wrote: BTW, I've recently changed my mind on the repo-combining: We should work on splitting up our code, not combine it in a single repo. Our modules are too tightly coupled; sometimes even from foo import bar doesn't

Re: [Sugar-devel] Bug tracking Vs Patch review

2010-09-02 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On 2 Sep 2010, at 21:02, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote: Let's get started this way. If needed, we could refine the rules later on. To avoid confusion, I'd wait updating the documentation in the wiki until we've tested this new workflow for a while. If a maintainer cannot stand to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Enhancing Sugar to support multiple users

2010-09-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: I don't think you can give Sugar an accountname as a startup parameter, so there's at least something to change. When you start Sugar, you are already in an user account, so you don't really need to give it an username.

Re: [Sugar-devel] Enhancing Sugar to support multiple users

2010-09-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti ma...@marcopg.org wrote: Not sure how account name and sugar nick name should interact. Ideally they would be the same I think, but then you can't change the name easily. A possible approach might be sugar nick name == account full name. I

Re: [Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Patch to display 'Sugar inside Xephyr' instead of 'Xephyr on' in the title bar. Ticket #2285

2010-09-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Ishan Bansal is...@seeta.in wrote: This patch is to display 'Sugar inside Xephyr' instead of 'Xephyr on' in the title bar of the sugar windows. ---  sugar-0.88-0.88.1/src/jarabe/util/emulator.py |    1 +  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff

Re: [Sugar-devel] requesting reviews

2010-09-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Hi, please don't submit the same patch for review to both trac and the mailing list, otherwise the review discussion bifurcates. I would add this to http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Talk:Development_Team/Code_Review in the

Re: [Sugar-devel] Patch review request for ticket #2290

2010-09-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Dipankar Patro dipan...@seeta.in wrote: Hi, In reference to ticket #2290 (http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2290) I have uploaded a patch (have attached it too). Problem: in the register procedure the time out of connection was not implemented, for an

Re: [Sugar-devel] Patch review request for ticket #2290

2010-09-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Dipankar Patro dipan...@seeta.in wrote: Sorry for that duplicate bug. Missed out that lfaraone already filed the bug. I have attached the revised patch. (uploaded at bugs.sl.o too) * changed things (subject, description, etc) according to Sascha Silbe's

Re: [Sugar-devel] Patch review request for ticket #2290

2010-09-06 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: Previous discussion is actually in http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/2289 and not in #2290. Looks like we cannot do XML-RPC with GIO because it doesn't support POST for http requests. The right component in our stack

Re: [Sugar-devel] internationalization: homonym handling in genpot?

2010-09-10 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Erik Blankinship er...@mediamods.com wrote: (maybe there is genpot list where this message is more apropos?  Sorry, genpot is opaque to me.) My activity has two identical-in-english strings (homonyms) which need translating, but have two different meanings

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar and activities flag day

2010-09-13 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: On 10 September 2010 13:41, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote: Just wanted to summarize an enlightening conversation that just happened in #sugar: No responses..surprising! Let me try a bit harder then. My

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar and activities flag day

2010-09-14 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: One way of seeing things that might make more palatable 0.92 == 1.0 is that we are really still in the first iteration and 1.0 will be when that first iteration reaches maturity, without big changes in the API. After 1.0

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar and activities flag day

2010-09-14 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: I myself, do not draw too much on version numbers. If you look at the consequences in support then what we shipped with 0.82 was 1.0. Exactly! Marco ___ Sugar-devel mailing

Re: [Sugar-devel] Sugar and activities flag day

2010-09-20 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote: The hackers at #python in GIMPNet have proposed holding a hackfest for porting Sugar to introspection and thus getting PyGObject ready. Who else would be interested from the Sugar side? We'll also need sponsors for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Moving forward (Sugar-devel Digest, Vol 24, Issue 161)

2010-10-26 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm not really in the field of ITC but I do know a bit about projects, particularly collaborative ones. Every development project to have a hope of success it needs Clearly defined aims Clearly defined road

Re: [Sugar-devel] Browse scaling for XO display

2010-11-04 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote: http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/hulahop/repos/mainline/blobs/master/python/__init__.py#line96 We still do set the DPI in hulahop. Slightly OT: However I think some pages display rather badly on the XO. For example

  1   2   >