On 01/06/2015 08:20 PM, Sam P. wrote:
- Binaries built for different architectures (i686, x86_64, arm...)
Do you have an example for this? I tried physics, but it does not have
a native part. I will try and use git-annex or a similar solution, as
discussed on irc.
IIRC, the Physics
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:39:06PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
+sugar-devel
On 01/06/2015 04:52 AM, Sam P. wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering about the possibility of putting the new ASLO bundles on
the download.sl.o mirror. I was going to put them into a separate
folder (named
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:24:47AM +, Sam P. wrote:
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:54:19 am James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:39:06PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
+sugar-devel
On 01/06/2015 04:52 AM, Sam P. wrote:
Hi All,
I
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:54:19 am James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:39:06PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
+sugar-devel
On 01/06/2015 04:52 AM, Sam P. wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering about the possibility of putting the new ASLO bundles
on
the
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:39:12 am Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
wrote:
+sugar-devel
On 01/06/2015 04:52 AM, Sam P. wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering about the possibility of putting the new ASLO bundles on
the download.sl.o mirror. I was going to put them into a separate
folder
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 10:44:40 am James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:24:47AM +, Sam P. wrote:
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 8:54:19 am James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:39:06PM -0500, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
+sugar-devel
On 01/06/2015 07:30 PM, Sam P. wrote:
Slow propagation will cause some issues. So just SSHFS it?
sshfs introduces too much latency and is unsuitable for serving.
Instead, run an scp (or rsync over ssh) every time something changes,
like for example as a post-upload hook.
--
_ // Bernie
+sugar-devel
On 01/06/2015 04:52 AM, Sam P. wrote:
Hi All,
I was wondering about the possibility of putting the new ASLO bundles on
the download.sl.o mirror. I was going to put them into a separate
folder (named activities2), so there may be duplication from the old
ASLO bundles,
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:59:58AM +, Sam P. wrote:
James wrote:
Is it so different that the bundle .xo file content is different?
Why? That would mean an .xo downloaded from old ASLO would be
different to .xo downloaded for new ASLO, right?
Well, the bundles should have the same
On 01/06/2015 07:59 PM, Sam P. wrote:
But that is only 1/2 the bundles. For every commit that the bots are
notified about, the new ASLO builds a bundle as a development/latest
copy. These are available in the new ASLO UI as devel version bundles.
I plan to purge these on a cron job, so
Hi Bernie,
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 12:12 pm Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
On 01/06/2015 07:59 PM, Sam P. wrote:
But that is only 1/2 the bundles. For every commit that the bots are
notified about, the new ASLO builds a bundle as a development/latest
copy. These are available in the
11 matches
Mail list logo
