Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi, I didn't get a chance to retry those fixes. Instead, I am using sugar-build on my old Ubuntu 14.04 installation. Regards, Utkarsh Tiwari On Fri 1 Dec, 2017, 6:19 AM James Cameron, wrote: > Any progress on this, Utkarsh? > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:38:44PM +1100, James

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Any progress on this, Utkarsh? On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:38:44PM +1100, James Cameron wrote: > Yes, please do. You faced at least two issues that you could add. You may > have faced others that you solved before asking? > > The old page mentioned several issues with using sugar-build, but

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Yes, please do. You faced at least two issues that you could add. You may have faced others that you solved before asking? The old page mentioned several issues with using sugar-build, but (a) we are not using sugar-build now, and (b) some of those issues won’t be relevant to downloading a

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi, I agree but it would be also helpful if we could add a fix section (similar to the old developer.md page) for commonly faced issues while setting up the development environment. In this way newcomers can resolve the errors themselves. Let's see what others suggest. Regards, Utkarsh Tiwari

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

This has nothing to do with sugar-build. Please include small errors in the body of mail so that your readers don’t have to reach out to a web browser to get them, and so that mail can be searched for keywords in the errors. The error this time was "E: Unable to find a source package for

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

To my best of my knowledge, this is not from the sugar-build. There is something wrong with the terminal, you might be running something under background. 1. Try restarting the computer, if that doesn't work, do; 2. https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1853026 Try this, and ping again if

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi, Okay let us know if it works on ubuntu 17.10. Thanks On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Utkarsh Tiwari wrote: > Hi, > > The instructions you just mentioned - > > for module in sugar{-datastore,-artwork,-toolkit,-toolkit-gtk3,}; do > dnf builddep $module >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi, The instructions you just mentioned - for module in sugar{-datastore,-artwork,-toolkit,-toolkit-gtk3,}; do dnf builddep $module done works for Fedora whereas I am on Ubuntu 16.04 so I followed the instructions for Ubuntu/Debian - for module in

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hello, I just checked in the guides, you should be doing this when you want to build, your logs show that you aren't: for module in sugar{-datastore,-artwork,-toolkit,-toolkit-gtk3,}; do dnf builddep $module done On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 6:15 PM, Glide wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hey, Are you sure you ran the git clone request properly? On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 5:27 PM, Utkarsh Tiwari wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you Glide for your suggestion. I tried running the instructions in > su mode but still getting these issues - https://gist.github.com/

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hi, Thank you Glide for your suggestion. I tried running the instructions in su mode but still getting these issues - https://gist.github.com/iamutkarshtiwari/84742d622a1d221bd1c814ce98baa32e Regards, Utkarsh Tiwari On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 at 20:50 Glide wrote: >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Help with setting up sugar-build on Ubuntu 16.04

Hello there, >From what i've seen in the logs and to the best of my knowledge, it seems you need to run as root, to gain root access, run su in your terminal. I hope this works for you. On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Utkarsh Tiwari wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I