Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-22 Thread James Cameron
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Feature_Template On the one hand it is a useful template to guide a consensus approach, most of us are familar with it, and it ties into the release process. On the other hand, - the feature process is tied to the Wiki, and as most people here aren't

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread Tony Anderson
Is a wiki features page the right way to get the design documented for this project? Tony On 05/20/2017 05:54 AM, Walter Bender wrote: One of the pre-summer tasks is to answer that question. On May 19, 2017 5:51 PM, "James Cameron" > wrote:

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 05:57:18PM -0400, Samuel Cantero wrote: > I thought the community had the answer about why ASLOv2 failed! What was the answer? -- James Cameron http://quozl.netrek.org/ ___ Sugar-devel mailing list

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread James Cameron
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 06:13:44PM +0800, Tony Anderson wrote: > Thanks for the list of Fructose activities, I have been trying to > find a definitive list since the issue was raised. I'm surprised. Just ask next time? You asked on a Debian mailing list, but it was off-topic for that list, and

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread Samuel Cantero
I thought the community had the answer about why ASLOv2 failed! Personally, I would love to review Sam's ASLO. Best, Sam C. On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 5:54 PM, Walter Bender wrote: > One of the pre-summer tasks is to answer that question. > > > On May 19, 2017 5:51 PM,

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread Walter Bender
One of the pre-summer tasks is to answer that question. On May 19, 2017 5:51 PM, "James Cameron" wrote: > Samuel & Jatin, > > Rather than make a new Django app to replace a PHP app, please > consider the previous New ASLO written by Sam Parkinson with help from > many of us

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread James Cameron
Samuel & Jatin, Rather than make a new Django app to replace a PHP app, please consider the previous New ASLO written by Sam Parkinson with help from many of us here. https://github.com/samdroid-apps/aslo This work started around 16th April 2014, and the last commit was on 18th July 2015. It

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread Tony Anderson
Thanks very much for this. I am optimistic that our path is converging. * The "python setup.py genpot" step implemented in BundleBuilder does extract the summary and description for localisation. The best problem is one that is already solved. * The root problem is the loss of activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-19 Thread James Cameron
Composite reply to several posts, see text in quoted context below. In summary; - the translation of summary and description is already handled by sugar3.activity.bundlebuilder module, - a root problem is loss of activity maintainers, and this effort won't fix that, so it will be wasted

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-18 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi Chris Currently there are two text fields per activity in ASLO: Summary and Description. This gets a bit more complicated since these text fields edited by the developer in github. Perhaps this might work. Have a po directory in the activities/ directory of the bundle. When the activity

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-18 Thread Chris Leonard
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Tony Anderson wrote: > Hi, Jatin > > I think you are familiar with Pootle. The trick with Django is that the > display of strings is indirect. > > First, the locale is set client-side so ASLO needs to determine the > applicable locale -

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-18 Thread Tony Anderson
Hi Sam, Thanks for the proposal. Naturally this raises the question of the relationship between your ASLOv3 and the GSOC project. Do you see two parallel implementations or a merger of the two projects? I agree with your proposal to install the activity repositories in

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-18 Thread Samuel Cantero
I just realized that proposal wasn't send to sugar-devel list. It was removed from the thread at some point. So I just forward the link again. Sorry for people subscribed to multiple lists. https://goo.gl/VEIzCr Best, Sam C. On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:06 PM, James Cameron

Re: [Sugar-devel] New ASLO Project Definition

2017-05-17 Thread James Cameron
Yes, please attach any files that developers should see. The sugar-devel@ mailing list has a message size limit of 1024K. Messages above the limit are held for approval by Sebastian and I. My previous offer still stands; if people truly have no time to edit a Wiki, set up public web hosting, or