2009/7/10 Eben Eliason e...@laptop.org:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 16:25, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Martin
Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:01:19AM
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:41, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Nobody in the world seems to
On 11 Jul 2009, at 19:15, Edward Cherlin wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:41, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:41, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Eduardo H. Silvahoboprim...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/9 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 05:41, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Eduardo H. Silvahoboprim...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/7/9 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:29,
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:01:19AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
But are you meaning that we should name the current one Keep a copy
and when we have versions add Keep?
No, no. I'm urging that we name it Keep new version
Eben Eliason wrote:
No, no. I'm urging that we name it Keep new version now if we rename
it, so that it's meaning doesn't change down the road when versions
are introduced.
We should call it Checkpoint and let the localization teams sort it out.
The English-speakers will have no problem
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Martin
Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:01:19AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
But are you meaning that we should name the current one Keep a copy
and when
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 16:25, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Martin
Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:01:19AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:28 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
But are you
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 16:25, Eben Eliasone...@laptop.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Martin
Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:01:19AM -0400, Eben Eliason wrote:
On Fri, Jul
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Perhaps it's time for a rethink/redesign.
This functionality could be moved to the journal itself, in a place
where it can be presented with more context, something like Create
duplicate copy. Or even some kind of visual feedback
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Nobody in the world seems to understand the Keep button. People think
it's for regular saving and you should do it before you close or switch
away from your activity.
That's not far from the truth, right? At least in any
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Nobody in the world seems to understand the Keep button. People think
it's for regular saving and you should do it before you close or switch
away from your activity.
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Nobody in the world seems to understand the Keep button. People think
it's for regular saving and you should
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
Nobody in the world seems to
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 02:03:06PM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
As far as I understand it, Keep is useful for these types of
scenarios: - you've done a lot
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Gary C Marting...@garycmartin.com wrote:
On 9 Jul 2009, at 11:29, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Daniel Drake
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Tomeu Vizosoto...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100, Martin Dengler wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at
Hi All,
8 months in the tank at 1CC sitting next to Eben, you'd think I know
how this was designed to work ;-(
I've actually read the HIG too!
I see two case here:
Case 1 - Create something in one activity and then use it right away another.
I forgot that switching to a new activity puts a copy
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Eduardo H. Silvahoboprim...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/7/9 Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Denglermar...@martindengler.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 11:22:16AM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 10:45 +0100,
20 matches
Mail list logo
