Re: [Sugar-devel] PLEASE REVIEW

2018-03-27 Thread Samson Goddy
First switch your documents from PDF and upload on Google doc.. give comment access, you have about 3 hours more. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 12:29 PM tola temitope wrote: > Good day all, Please i want my project reviewed by the mentors and others > > Thanks >

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review two important bug fixes (was: Re: [PATCH sugar] Journal detail view: don't choke on invalid 'keep' property, [PATCH sugar-datastore] Ensure we return valid internal / c

2012-03-13 Thread Simon Schampijer
On 03/06/2012 10:24 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: Excerpts from Sascha Silbe's message of 2012-01-09 12:02:12 +0100: Excerpts from Sascha Silbe's message of 2011-11-02 23:28:28 +0100: [sugar patch] Properties of data store entries can get corrupted, e.g. due to low level crashes or running out of

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review two important bug fixes (was: Re: [PATCH sugar] Journal detail view: don't choke on invalid 'keep' property, [PATCH sugar-datastore] Ensure we return valid internal / c

2012-03-13 Thread Sascha Silbe
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2012-03-13 13:57:00 +0100: On 03/06/2012 10:24 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote: [1] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/1032/ [2] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/1136/ Both are fine to push with the amended description. Pushed as 9fd345f [1]

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review Make Your Own Sugar Activities! on Amazon

2011-05-20 Thread James Simmons
Thanks to Caryl's suggestion, I've racked up another three sales, bringing the total to six, and my Amazon ranking to: This format of Make Your Own Sugar Ac... is currently ranked #41,185 out of over 750,000 books in the Kindle Store. I'm pretty sure if I can sell another three I'll get invited

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review code (was Re: Speak answering maths questions)

2010-06-02 Thread Aleksey Lim
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:52:11PM +1200, Tim McNamara wrote: Hi Chris, et al. ref http://pastebin.com/2XNCHGiy I am most of the way there, as you can see from lines 91 - 143. The function is attempting to return something that can be read out loud back to a child if they ask the Speak

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review code

2010-06-01 Thread Chris Ball
Hi Tim, I am most of the way there, as you can see from lines 91 - 143. The function is attempting to return something that can be read out loud back to a child if they ask the Speak robot a mathematical question. Looks good to me. My biggest question is the best way to

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review code (was Re: Speak answering maths questions)

2010-06-01 Thread Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
This is great Tim, this is one of the features that we would like to see on Speak for some time now. I've heard these ideas by professors that we have been working with in Bogotá, Colombia. Rafael Ortiz On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Tim McNamara paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote: Hi