Re: [Sugar-devel] PLEASE REVIEW

[Samson Goddy]

First switch your documents from PDF and upload on Google doc.. give
comment access, you have about 3 hours more.

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018, 12:29 PM tola temitope  wrote:

> Good day all, Please i want my project reviewed by the mentors and others
>
> Thanks
> ___
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review two important bug fixes (was: Re: [PATCH sugar] Journal detail view: don't choke on invalid 'keep' property, [PATCH sugar-datastore] Ensure we return valid internal / c

[Simon Schampijer]

On 03/06/2012 10:24 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:

Excerpts from Sascha Silbe's message of 2012-01-09 12:02:12 +0100:

Excerpts from Sascha Silbe's message of 2011-11-02 23:28:28 +0100:

[sugar patch]

Properties of data store entries can get corrupted, e.g. due to low level
crashes or running out of battery (see OLPC#11372 [1] for a real-life
example). In addition any activity can - accidentally or on purpose - write
data store entries with arbitrary metadata.

[...]

[sugar-datastore patch]

The copy in the metadata storage can get corrupted, e.g. due to low level
crashes or running out of battery (see OLPC#11372 [1] for a real-life
example).

[...]

Ping. These two patches [1,2] are important bug fixes. Without them,
Sugar can be left crippled after a system crash.


Can somebody review the patches so we can finally land these important
bug fixes, please?


Sascha

[1] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/1032/
[2] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/1136/


Both are fine to push with the amended description.

Regards,
   Simon
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review two important bug fixes (was: Re: [PATCH sugar] Journal detail view: don't choke on invalid 'keep' property, [PATCH sugar-datastore] Ensure we return valid internal / c

[Sascha Silbe]

Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2012-03-13 13:57:00 +0100:
 On 03/06/2012 10:24 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
  [1] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/1032/
  [2] https://patchwork.sugarlabs.org/patch/1136/
 
 Both are fine to push with the amended description.

Pushed as 9fd345f [1] (sugar-datastore) and 55a4df2 [2] (sugar). Thanks
for the review!

Sascha

[1] 
https://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar-datastore/mainline/commit/9fd345f4b87c074cf50e82376020b7585eac
[2] 
https://git.sugarlabs.org/sugar/mainline/commit/55a4df2fb8476d295f90767d42f54eca81b37cd9
-- 
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review Make Your Own Sugar Activities! on Amazon

[James Simmons]

Thanks to Caryl's suggestion, I've racked up another three sales,
bringing the total to six, and my Amazon ranking to:

This format of Make Your Own Sugar Ac... is currently ranked
#41,185 out of over 750,000 books in the Kindle Store.

I'm pretty sure if I can sell another three I'll get invited on Oprah.

No reviews yet, but I have two Likes for the book and none at all
for the Author.  I guess people are withholding judgment until I've
written more books.

James Simmons


On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:41 AM, James Simmons nices...@gmail.com wrote:
 The e-book Make Your Own Sugar Activities! is in the Kindle Store on Amazon:

 http://www.amazon.com/Make-Your-Sugar-Activities-ebook/dp/B0050VAHKW/ref=ntt_at_ep_dpt_1

 On its first day it racked up three sales at .99 apiece.  Sales seem
 to have stalled at three.  Amazon tells me that based on these three
 sales my rank is around 96,000 out of some 750,000 books total.

 One thing successful books have on their pages is reviews.  Many of
 you on these lists have praised this book or thanked me for writing
 it.  If a few of you could log into Amazon and write a short review
 that may be enough to launch a few more sales.  It doesn't have to be
 long or gushing.  It doesn't even have to be a *good* review.  Even a
 review like Publication of this e-book has set back childrens
 education by at least ten years! would be better than no review at
 all.  Heck, I'd read a book with a review like that.

 Thanks in advance,

 James Simmons
 Author
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review code (was Re: Speak answering maths questions)

[Aleksey Lim]

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 10:52:11PM +1200, Tim McNamara wrote:
 Hi Chris, et al.
 
 ref http://pastebin.com/2XNCHGiy
 
 I am most of the way there, as you can see from lines 91 - 143. The function
 is attempting to return something that can be read out loud back to a child
 if they ask the Speak robot a mathematical question.
 
 My biggest question is the best way to import the functionality from the
 Calculate activity. As per silbe's comments on IRC, I'm leaning towards
 duplicating the two modules inside of the Speak activity.

Such duplicating in common case is not good idea (but could optimal
option in case of Calculate modules). Anyway what about creating libmath
(or so) and patch Speak (at least) and Calculate to use this lib.

In case of Speak, it is already using 0sugar dependecies[1]. You can create
separate project on git like libjournal[2]. Only libmath string will be
added[3] to [1] to use libmath in Speak. 0sugar is not yet ready for
broad usage but it can work in case of libmath.

[1] 
http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/speak/repos/mainline/blobs/master/activity/activity.info#line10)
[2] http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/journal-service
[3] 
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Documentation_Team/Services/Activity_Developers_Guide

 I guess I could implement my own parser, I thought about using the ast
 module. Then I realised that I would just make a poor replication of the
 parser  evaluator that's already been created.
 
 Thoughts/comments welcome.
 
 Tim
 
 
 
 On 30 May 2010 05:34, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
 
  Hi Tim,
 
  I'd suggest looking at the parsing logic in the Calculate activity --
  it deals with the same problems.
 
  - Chris.
  --
  Chris Ball   c...@laptop.org
  One Laptop Per Child
 

 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


-- 
Aleksey
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review code

[Chris Ball]

Hi Tim,

I am most of the way there, as you can see from lines 91 -
143. The function is attempting to return something that can be
read out loud back to a child if they ask the Speak robot a
mathematical question.

Looks good to me.

My biggest question is the best way to import the functionality
from the Calculate activity. As per silbe's comments on IRC, I'm
leaning towards duplicating the two modules inside of the Speak
activity.

Yes, duplication seems to be the best idea for now.

Thanks!

- Chris.
-- 
Chris Ball   c...@laptop.org
One Laptop Per Child
___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel

Re: [Sugar-devel] Please review code (was Re: Speak answering maths questions)

[Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero]

This is great Tim,
this is one of the features that we would like to see on Speak for
some time now. I've heard these ideas by professors that we have been
working with in Bogotá, Colombia.



Rafael Ortiz



On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:52 AM, Tim McNamara
paperl...@timmcnamara.co.nz wrote:
 Hi Chris, et al.

 ref http://pastebin.com/2XNCHGiy

 I am most of the way there, as you can see from lines 91 - 143. The function
 is attempting to return something that can be read out loud back to a child
 if they ask the Speak robot a mathematical question.

 My biggest question is the best way to import the functionality from the
 Calculate activity. As per silbe's comments on IRC, I'm leaning towards
 duplicating the two modules inside of the Speak activity.

 I guess I could implement my own parser, I thought about using the ast
 module. Then I realised that I would just make a poor replication of the
 parser  evaluator that's already been created.

 Thoughts/comments welcome.

 Tim



 On 30 May 2010 05:34, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:

 Hi Tim,

 I'd suggest looking at the parsing logic in the Calculate activity --
 it deals with the same problems.

 - Chris.
 --
 Chris Ball   c...@laptop.org
 One Laptop Per Child


 ___
 Sugar-devel mailing list
 Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
 http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel


___
Sugar-devel mailing list
Sugar-devel@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel