Hello!
Le Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:23:38 +0300, Martin Langhoff
martin.langh...@gmail.com a écrit:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Bobby Powersbobbypow...@gmail.com
wrote:
While not hand-tuned, I believe on the latest rawhide-xo images (and
Fedora 11) you can download
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Bobby Powersbobbypow...@gmail.com wrote:
While not hand-tuned, I believe on the latest rawhide-xo images (and
Fedora 11) you can download
http://dev.laptop.org/~bobbyp/surf/Surf-106.xo
for a WebKit based browsing experience. The packages pywebkitgtk and
Now that WebKit seems
to be better supported in F11+, I can try to bundle a modified webkit
.so that reduces memory usage as much as possible.
That'd be *nice*!
There's a new version of webkitgtk in F-11 updates-testing that is the
same as the one in rawhide. Early on in the move towards
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:29:25PM +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
I meant the code. I really don't have time, but someone could do a
benchmark since there is code for Browse-webkit. As rough as it may
be.
Ahh, I get it now .-)
Firefox is still way behind, especially on embedded devices.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 01:01:27PM -0400, Bobby Powers wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Martin
Langhoffmartin.langh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Lucian
Branesculucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think I
Hi Luke,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 23:08, Luke Kenneth Casson Leightonl...@lkcl.net wrote:
folks, hi,
i might have mentioned some of this before, but wanted to emphasise a
few things - please bear with me if you've heard some of it before.
i'd been looking for python bindings to DOM model
On 6/9/09, Bobby Powers bobbypow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Luke
hallooo
Actually, I believe Jan, the pywebkitgtk maintainer, started off with
OLPC's Browse activity for that demo. He then modified it to use the
new webkit bindings instead of hulahop ones.
ahh, that would explain the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
l...@lkcl.net wrote:
(...)
once done, you'd be able to pretty much drop the exact same olpc
browser onto KHTML, webkit or xul. and, other than the c++
rtti-related bugs in KHTML, you'd get exactly the same functionality.
Cool.
On 6/10/09, Tomeu Vizoso to...@sugarlabs.org wrote:
Hi Luke,
hii tomeu
so i just wanted to ask: do you _know_ how many people have been
looking, for years, for python bindings to XUL? are you _aware_ how
powerful and how under-appreciated hulahop is? :) the mozilla mailing
lists
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:42:49PM +, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
Two things to consider when looking at this...
- Startup, memory use and general responsiveness on XO hardware and
general netbook hw. The current Browse.xo
Before GSoC started, I did my own tests of webkit vs gecko. Firefox
lost everywhere and lost especially bad on memory usage.
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/317039/webkit%20vs%20gecko%20osx.txt
http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/317039/webkit%20vs%20gecko%20soas.txt
I don't think I have the results anymore, but benches between
epiphany-webkit and epiphany-gecko were very similar.
The benchmarks I've used stress the browser engine, especially
javascript. Perceived performance is usually better with webkit as
well, though.
2009/6/10 Jonas Smedegaard
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Lucian
Branesculucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think I have the results anymore, but benches between
epiphany-webkit and epiphany-gecko were very similar.
Lucian -- what Jonas and I are trying to say is: even if gecko is
(was?) by less performant than
Not now, I have my own work to do for GSoC.
I have talked to tomeu about what it would take to give Browse the
ability to switch between engines. The general conclusion was that
another layer of indirection would be needed, on top of
hulahop/pywebkitgtk that Browse would use.
Hand tuning or not,
Apparently someone did that for me
http://www.j5live.com/2007/08/02/webkit-and-xulrunner-mozilla-side-by-side-on-the-xo/
2009/6/10 Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Lucian
Branesculucian.brane...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think I have the results
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
Apparently someone did that for me
http://www.j5live.com/2007/08/02/webkit-and-xulrunner-mozilla-side-by-side-on-the-xo/
That one I believe is known to old-timers of this list.
I meant the code. I really don't have time, but someone could do a
benchmark since there is code for Browse-webkit. As rough as it may
be.
Firefox is still way behind, especially on embedded devices.
2009/6/10 Jonas Smedegaard d...@jones.dk:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:29:25PM +0100, Lucian Branescu wrote:
I meant the code. I really don't have time, but someone could do a
benchmark since there is code for Browse-webkit. As rough as it may
be.
Ahh, I get it now .-)
Firefox is still
Hi Luke
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson
Leightonl...@lkcl.net wrote:
folks, hi,
i might have mentioned some of this before, but wanted to emphasise a
few things - please bear with me if you've heard some of it before.
i'd been looking for python bindings to DOM model
19 matches
Mail list logo
