Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-17 Thread Morgan Collett
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Albert Cahalan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I still like Sugar\Windows (with backwards slash of course), To deviate from the taxonomy idea, how about Candy Glass - an alternative name for sugar glass - the stuff they use to make the windows for movie sets when people

Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-17 Thread Shikhar
Tomeu Vizoso wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important, distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar

Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-17 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Changes I'd make to use Ben taxonomy: * In the schedule section s/Sugar/Sucrose Benjamin, you didn't make this change on the wiki. Intentional? Marco ___ Sugar mailing

Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-17 Thread Kevin Cole
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To resolve this, I am going to attempt to list a number of important, distinct digital objects that this work has produced. I will also introduce cutesy codenames. I hope that the Sugar developers will adopt a

[sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-16 Thread Benjamin M. Schwartz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think Sugar has a naming problem. There are a lot of different digital objects being produced by this project, and referring to all of them as Sugar is becoming increasingly confusing. For example, the discussion about Sugar on Windows has been

Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-16 Thread Frederick Grose
Nice carbohydrate lesson as well! --Frederick Grose On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think Sugar has a naming problem. There are a lot of different digital objects being produced

Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-16 Thread Marco Pesenti Gritti
: SHA1 I think Sugar has a naming problem. There are a lot of different digital objects being produced by this project, and referring to all of them as Sugar is becoming increasingly confusing. For example, the discussion about Sugar on Windows has been all but incomprehensible, because each

Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-16 Thread Walter Bender
, May 16, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Frederick Grose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice carbohydrate lesson as well! --Frederick Grose On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I think Sugar has a naming problem

Re: [sugar] On the Naming of Sugar

2008-05-16 Thread Jameson Chema Quinn
Just a note: in Spanish, sweet and candy are the same word. Sweetness is less problematic in Spanish, and I'd guess at worst the same as sweet in most languages, so I suggest trying for that. has sweetness is more explicit than is sweet anyway. (This kind of problem, as well as tougher googling,