Re: [suggest] rrdtool 1.3.9

Am Montag, den 04.01.2010, 08:21 +0100 schrieb Christoph Maser: Am Samstag, den 02.01.2010, 11:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Mansour: Hi, Any chance of updating rrdtool packages to 1.3.9? Thanks. Michael. Will do, also I will put 1.4 in testing. Ok 1.3.9 is submitted. 1.4 has to wait

[suggest] rpmlint 0.92 take two

Hi Dag. Ah, found the problem in the config file and excluded the line: setOption(ReleaseExtension, None) After that, the config file works again. I have attached a new spec file and a new config.redhat (in the archive file). Regards, Bjarne Done. The package will become available in the

Re: [suggest] rpmlint 0.92 take two

Hi, On 01/05/2010 04:25 PM, arnebjarn...@hotmail.com wrote: I have attached a new spec file and a new config.redhat (in the archive file). Unless the patch is exceptionally large ( eg: 40KiB ) why not send it in a text attachment ? Significantly lowers the amount of effort required to look

Re: [suggest] rpmlint 0.92 take two

Hi Karanbir. I am just used to zip/tar attachments, since I often see spam filters silent drop attachments other than compressed archive files. But I have no problems with sending diff patches uncomprssed if that is preferred by the RPMforge maintainers :-) Regards, Bjarne Unless the patch

Re: [suggest] rpmlint 0.92 take two

On 01/05/2010 05:09 PM, arnebjarn...@hotmail.com wrote: I am just used to zip/tar attachments, since I often see spam filters silent drop attachments other than compressed archive files. But I have no problems with sending diff patches uncomprssed if that is preferred by the RPMforge maintainers

Re: [suggest] Munin 1.4.2 is out

Ingvar Hagelund wrote on Thu, 24 Dec 2009 00:47:19 +0100 (CET): Similar rpms for rhel4 and rhel5 are available at the download page, linked from the homepage at http://munin-monitoring.org . Ah, thanks, I wasn't aware that there are rpm packages on the SF download page. I suggest you mention

Re: [suggest] rpmlint 0.92 take two

On Tue, 5 Jan 2010, arnebjarn...@hotmail.com wrote: Unless the patch is exceptionally large ( eg: 40KiB ) why not send it in a text attachment ? Significantly lowers the amount of effort required to look see. Just a question really. I am just used to zip/tar attachments, since I often

Re: [suggest] rrdtool 1.3.9

Am Montag, den 04.01.2010, 08:21 +0100 schrieb Christoph Maser: Am Samstag, den 02.01.2010, 11:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Mansour: Hi, Any chance of updating rrdtool packages to 1.3.9? Thanks. Michael. Will do, also I will put 1.4 in testing. Ok 1.3.9 is submitted.