YVZ == Yury V Zaytsev y...@shurup.com
Yury,
YVZ I didn't know you don't have commit access. I committed
YVZ the patch with minor changes. Actually, it didn't apply,
YVZ so it seems that you have other fancy stuff it your
YVZ sleeves which you are reluctant to share ;-)
The .spec
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 10:49 -0700, Claire M. Connelly wrote:
The .spec patch or the Makefile (javahl) patch?
The SPEC patch.
There might be other reasons for this (e.g. your patch could have been
based on the SPEC extracted from the SRPM instead of the SVN revision).
I was making a joke,
YVZ == Yury V Zaytsev y...@shurup.com
YVZ There might be other reasons for this (e.g. your patch
YVZ could have been based on the SPEC extracted from the SRPM
YVZ instead of the SVN revision).
Yes, it was against the SRPM spec file.
YVZ I was making a joke, actually... :-)
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:38 -0700, Claire M. Connelly wrote:
YVZ I was making a joke, actually... :-)
Aha. Sorry, getting that build to work was pretty painful.
It's fine :-) FYI, you can fetch the svn revision of the SPEC from here:
http://svn.rpmforge.net/svn/trunk/rpms/subversion/
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:38 -0700, Claire M. Connelly wrote:
YVZ I was making a joke, actually... :-)
Aha. Sorry, getting that build to work was pretty painful.
It's fine :-) FYI, you can fetch the svn revision of the SPEC from here:
Hi!
On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 16:28 -0700, C.M. Connelly wrote:
Attached is a diff to get the existing spec file to work to build
the Java bindings, plus a patch you need to apply to actually get
them to link properly.
I didn't know you don't have commit access. I committed the patch with
minor
CMC == C.M. Connelly c...@math.hmc.edu
CMC I noticed that the RPMForge Subversion packages don't
CMC include the JavaHL bindings, which means getting
CMC Subclipse* working with the RPMForge Subversion packages
CMC (on CentOS 5) is pretty tough.
Attached is a diff to get the
