Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not RPMforge package

On 07/01/2009 03:34 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: I just checked what our tool would do (dar-diff-perl.sh) and it would in fact remove the BuildRequires altogether. So it is safe to assume that our parser doesn't do this correctly. Thanks for the explanation, Dag and Christoph. I'll just continue to

[suggest] missing Perl dependencies in perl-Email-Store

hello folks! perl-Email-Store-0.255-1 requires Class::DBI, Class::Data::Inheritable, Ima::DBI, all of which are currently in RPMforge, but these dependencies are not captured in the spec. the patch is attached! -steve -- If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an

Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not RPMforge package

Christoph Maser wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 01.07.2009, 21:34 +0200 schrieb Dag Wieers: Good question. We do have SPEC files that still date back from before we used an automated process. I just checked what our tool would do (dar-diff-perl.sh) and it would in fact remove the BuildRequires