Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not RPMforge package

2009-07-02 Thread Philip Durbin
On 07/01/2009 03:34 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: I just checked what our tool would do (dar-diff-perl.sh) and it would in fact remove the BuildRequires altogether. So it is safe to assume that our parser doesn't do this correctly. Thanks for the explanation, Dag and Christoph. I'll just continue to

Re: [suggest] Dependencies listed in Perl module but not RPMforge package

2009-07-02 Thread Peter Willis
Christoph Maser wrote: Am Mittwoch, den 01.07.2009, 21:34 +0200 schrieb Dag Wieers: Good question. We do have SPEC files that still date back from before we used an automated process. I just checked what our tool would do (dar-diff-perl.sh) and it would in fact remove the BuildRequires