Hi Jakob,

thanks for the reply.
I am not sure, that the mentioned issue covers the problem.
What I am referring to is not a rendering issue (which is how I understood the 
description of https://github.com/DLR-TS/sumo/issues/3972)

When
1. converting the xodr with netconvert to sumo.net.xml
2. extracting raw geometry info from the xodr (-> wkt)
3. extracting raw geometry info from the net.xml (-> wkt)
4. visualizing those raw geometries in QGis
There apparently are noteworthy discrepancies.

or did I get something wrong?

thanks,
Gerald.

On 2018-04-08 22:12, Jakob Erdmann wrote:
Hello Gerald,
thank you for bringing this up.
the reason is explained here: https://github.com/DLR-TS/sumo/issues/3972
regards,
Jakob


2018-04-06 19:42 GMT+02:00 Richter Gerald 
<gerald.rich...@ait.ac.at<mailto:gerald.rich...@ait.ac.at>>:

Dear list,

recently I have been experimenting with xodr sources and their conversion to 
sumo net files.
Apart from encountering minor issues regarding the xodr compliance to standard 
v1.2 in netconvert,

I got suspicious of the fidelity of the geometry conversion while inserting 
signals as POIs.

The problem can be seen in the attached image.
It shows the rendering of lane-slabs (yellow) extracted from the odr file to 
wkt-files, which rather nicely matches the sat-map.
The xodr lanes are separated and bounded by the roadmarks in white and fit 
right next to each other.

When doing the same for the conversion result lane-data by using 
sumolib.net.readNet,
some differences show up. Cyan thin lines show the presumed center-lines of the 
lanes,
and the hatched slabs are the lane-polygons resulting from adding the width/2 
left and right of the center line.
They do not fit tightly as there is some space in between.

I checked this for some scenarios and a deviation shows consistently.
The good match between the xodr lanes and the satelite-images lets me assume 
that I did something right on that end.

Does anybody know of this issue? How to circumvent it?
I can provide such a comparison on some test-data, given the xodr-features are 
not too fancy...
and am willing to help.

best,
Gerald.

--


_______________________________________________
sumo-dev mailing list
sumo-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:sumo-dev@eclipse.org>
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-dev





_______________________________________________
sumo-dev mailing list
sumo-dev@eclipse.org<mailto:sumo-dev@eclipse.org>
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-dev


_______________________________________________
sumo-dev mailing list
sumo-dev@eclipse.org
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from 
this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sumo-dev

Reply via email to