Re: Re: average EOT correction

1999-09-28 Thread Slawomir K. Grzechnik
Pete To some extent you are right. If we limited ourselves to one kind of dials we would avoid few problems but the world of dialing would not be so fascinating. This is incredible how many ideas were introduced into sundials and every new design is a challenge for its creator how to solve

Re: average EOT correction

1999-09-27 Thread Mac Oglesby
Mike Shaw wrote: (snip) I have always had concerns with the EofT when it does not take into account the distance from the standard meridian - to the uninitiated, the dial STILL doesn't give clock time, reinforcing their (incorrect) opinion that sundials don't work properly. If I include an

Re: average EOT correction

1999-09-27 Thread Mark Gingrich
Mike Shaw asked: Snip For latitude +32 (isn't that your approximate latitude, John?), a horizontal dial's mean absolute error would be 6.8 minutes. Snip But don't you also have to adjust that figure for the longitude correction ? The 6.8-minute figure assumes a perfectly constructed,

average EOT correction

1999-09-26 Thread John Carmichael
Hi Guys: Just another quick question on EOT as long as we're on the subject again: Is the average EOT correction over the course of the entire year equal to about seven or eight minutes? from (16+15)/2/2=7.75 min.. As 16 minutes is about the extreme correction on Nov. 1st. and 15 minutes

average EOT correction

1999-09-26 Thread Patrick Powers
Message text written by John Carmichael then, on the average, if you read the time directly from a longitudinally corrected dial, your non-EOT corrected reading would be off by about seven minutes on any day of the year. That may be the average but the average doesn't have any meaning to the