Re: A tad off topic....?

1999-03-12 Thread Jim_Cobb
The following are the years from 1800 to 2100 in which February has no full moon. This is taken from Meeus's book. 180919152018 184719342037 186619612067 188519992094 Jim --- --

Re: Fwd: Re: A tad off topic....?

1999-03-12 Thread Jim_Cobb
Mark Wrigley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not quite true. Last month Australia had a full moon at about 2am on Feb 1. In Europe it was still January. Quite so. Meeus (careful calculator that he is) explicitly notes his use of UT (and the dependence of such a calculation on the time zone). The

Fwd: Re: A tad off topic....?

1999-03-12 Thread Mark Wrigley
Not quite true. Last month Australia had a full moon at about 2am on Feb 1. In Europe it was still January. From: Jim_Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jim Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: sundial@rrz.uni-koeln.de Subject: Re: A tad off topic? Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:44:47

Re: A tad off topic....?

1999-03-11 Thread Jim_Cobb
Jean Meeus's book Mathematical Astronomy Morsels http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0943396514/o/qid=921164695/sr=2-1/002-5697572-2293064 lists months over a period of about two hundred years which are missing a lunar phase. I believe it lists 1961 as the previous year (before this one)

Re: A tad off topic....?

1999-03-10 Thread PsykoKidd
This can't be true since February 1999 also didn't have a full moon. In addition since both the calander and the lunar cycle are periodic there must be repetition at some point. Previous Message: To all, Hmmm, hope I don't incur too much wrath over another moon question but I heard the other