ipsec would be 1366.
Ken Mandelberg wrote:
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:46:37 +
From: "Paul Shore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Connection through ssh tunnel?
To: "SunRay-Users mailing list"
Please make sure you lower the MTU size in the DHCP r
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:46:37 +
From: "Paul Shore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Connection through ssh tunnel?
To: "SunRay-Users mailing list"
Please make sure you lower the MTU size in the DHCP response to the client
to the maximum size
Please make sure you lower the MTU size in the DHCP response to the
client to the maximum size of packet that can be sent through the ipsec
tunnel. Any packets that are fragmented by the network will be
dropped by the Sun Ray dramatically effecting performance.
PaulOn 21/03/06, Ken Mandelberg <[E
I've been using a Solaris ipsec tunnel for connecting a remote dtu. It
works poorly compared with running directly through the same wan
connection. I was wondering if I could use a ssh port forwarding tunnel
instead of the ipsec tunnel. Is there a way to do that?
__
