.
Thanks so much for the feedback.
Craig
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ottomeister
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:10
AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users]
Network Isolation in a Shared Environment
On 3/17/06
D]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bender
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Network Isolation in a Shared Environment
Why use a FOG?
Craig Lehman wrote:
We want to share a common FOG with two different user groups where
t
On 3/17/06, Craig Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps it isn't possible to join the physical servers as a FOG andstill control which network paths the SRSS uses for communication and
redirection.
Does the customer understand that denying SRSS the ability to discover and
use alternate paths
On 3/17/06, Craig Lehman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We tested for isolation by creating a session on Server1, taking portoff line and watching for hang/DTU redirection to Server2 for new
session establishment. For non-existing sessions, DHCP option 49redirects login to surviving Server2; for exist
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bender
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:12 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Network Isolation in a Shared Environment
Perhaps I'm not understanding, but how can you have load balancing if
you want to lock DTU's from a subnet
der to give you guidance.
-Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bender
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Network Isolation in a Shared Environment
Why use a FOG?
Craig Lehman wrot
day, March 17, 2006 9:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Network Isolation in a Shared Environment
Why use a FOG?
Craig Lehman wrote:
We want to share a common FOG with two different user groups where
there
is an assurance of complete network isolation between
We want to benefit from user load distribution inherent to SRSS Failover
Groups.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bender
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 9:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Network Isolation
At a guess it'll be a Fail Over Group..
--
Leigh
Craig Bender wrote:
Why use a FOG?
Craig Lehman wrote:
We want to share a common FOG with two different user groups where there
is an assurance of complete network isolation between the two groups
(different SLAs, network traffic, etc..). DHC
Why use a FOG?
Craig Lehman wrote:
We want to share a common FOG with two different user groups where there
is an assurance of complete network isolation between the two groups
(different SLAs, network traffic, etc..). DHCP (Third party QIP) and
SRSS direction are strongly controlled by DTU MAC
We want to share a common FOG with two different user groups where there
is an assurance of complete network isolation between the two groups
(different SLAs, network traffic, etc..). DHCP (Third party QIP) and
SRSS direction are strongly controlled by DTU MAC addresses resulting in
correct behav
We want to share a common FOG with two different user groups where there
is an assurance of complete network isolation between the two groups
(different SLAs, network traffic, etc..). DHCP (Third party QIP) and
SRSS direction are strongly controlled by DTU MAC addresses resulting in
correct behav
12 matches
Mail list logo
