Hi Bob and Kent,
Sorry for my late reply. (I think something wrong with my e-mail server).
Here is the output of utgstatus:
Primary server: athqsvr06
hostflagsinterfaceflags
192.168.105.0/24
In order to be supported you need to have the Sun Ray Servers share at
least one common subnet. You experiment with allowing the routers to
pass multicast traffic you can read up on utgmtarget which will send
group announcements in unicast.
Mohamed Ali Abdullah wrote:
Hi Bob and Kent,
Dear users,
I have two sunray servers and deployed Cisco router in between the
servers. I want to configure the servers in a failover group. So i had
configure sunray software (utconfig) and choosed Y for failover. I
also typed utreplica -p from Primary server and utreplica -s from
secondary
What does /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utgstatus show on both of these servers?
Is utauthd running?
After your failed telnet to port 7009, what do you see in
/var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages? /var/opt/SUNWut/log/auth_log?
-Bob
Mohamed Ali wrote:
Dear users,
I have two sunray servers and deployed Cisco
On 02/26/09 05:56, Bob Doolittle wrote:
What does /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utgstatus show on both of these servers?
Is utauthd running?
After your failed telnet to port 7009, what do you see in
/var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages? /var/opt/SUNWut/log/auth_log?
It's simpler than that. These servers don't
Kent Peacock wrote:
On 02/26/09 05:56, Bob Doolittle wrote:
What does /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utgstatus show on both of these servers?
Is utauthd running?
After your failed telnet to port 7009, what do you see in
/var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages? /var/opt/SUNWut/log/auth_log?
It's simpler than that.
On 02/26/09 07:19, Bob Doolittle wrote:
Kent Peacock wrote:
On 02/26/09 05:56, Bob Doolittle wrote:
What does /opt/SUNWut/sbin/utgstatus show on both of these servers?
Is utauthd running?
After your failed telnet to port 7009, what do you see in
/var/opt/SUNWut/log/messages?
