Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
A little off topic but this may be of help to some in this group. Flash 9 beta works fine on Solaris 10 x86 with SRSS 3.1 http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html Not sure about Sparc. I remember the colors being swapped back in the day when my company ran Sun's Linux JDS 2. Upgraded to flash 7 and the colors appeared correctly. Surprised this is happening again in flash 9. Phillip Steinbachs wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Dave Hwang wrote: Anyone able to get the Flash 9 plugin working correctly on SRSS Linux? On my server (Fedora Core 5), it looks like the red and blue colors are switched for any flash site, though audio seems to be working fine. I've been trying to stick with the Flash 7 plugin, which was working fine, but now there are too many web sites that insist on the newer version. Are other people seeing this problem, or is it working for you, and if so, what distribution are you running? I found the following which is working for me... http://pulseaudio.revolutionlinux.com/PulseAudio Under Debian, I downloaded and installed the libflashsupport .deb package. I am using ESD, and I set FLASH_FORCE_ESD=1 prior to running firefox. Then I go to youtube.com as a test and it just works. Now if there is an easy solution to the smurf problem... -phillip ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Dave Hwang wrote: Anyone able to get the Flash 9 plugin working correctly on SRSS Linux? On my server (Fedora Core 5), it looks like the red and blue colors are switched for any flash site, though audio seems to be working fine. I've been trying to stick with the Flash 7 plugin, which was working fine, but now there are too many web sites that insist on the newer version. Are other people seeing this problem, or is it working for you, and if so, what distribution are you running? I found the following which is working for me... http://pulseaudio.revolutionlinux.com/PulseAudio Under Debian, I downloaded and installed the libflashsupport .deb package. I am using ESD, and I set FLASH_FORCE_ESD=1 prior to running firefox. Then I go to youtube.com as a test and it just works. Now if there is an easy solution to the smurf problem... -phillip ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 14:18 +0100, Sammy Atmadja wrote:
> The red-blue colour switch is something i can live with (kind of funny
> to see smurfs all over the internet). Although i'm curious how you
> managed to get audio working with flash9. I understand that flash 9 is
> alsa only, and sunray audio is OSS.
I've been using the LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc_ut.so trick and that seems
to work. Audio doesn't work perfectly. Some times the start of the audio
is garbled.
On my system, I made the following changes to the end of
the /usr/lib/firefox/run-mozilla.sh wrapper to setup LD_PRELOAD if on a
SunRay display:
export MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME LD_LIBRARY_PATH
export SHLIB_PATH LIBPATH LIBRARY_PATH ADDON_PATH DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH
# [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# Begin SunRay utaudio support
DPY=${DISPLAY#*:}
DPY=${DPY%.*}
DPYDIR=/var/opt/SUNWut/displays
# is this a local display?
if [ ":${DISPLAY##*:}" = "${DISPLAY}" ]
then
# is this a SunRay display?
if [ -a $DPYDIR/$DPY ]
then
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/libc_ut.so
export LD_PRELOAD
fi
fi
# End SunRay utaudio support
if [ $moz_debug -eq 1 ]
then
moz_debug_program ${1+"$@"}
else
moz_run_program ${1+"$@"}
fi
exit $exitcode
Hope this helps.
Dave
___
SunRay-Users mailing list
SunRay-Users@filibeto.org
http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
VMware Player/Console also show this problem, windows looks kinda funky with reds and blues swapped but the greens the same. Nick On 2/27/07, Dseven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sean Clarke wrote on 02/26/07 03:04: > Dave Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Anyone able to get the Flash 9 plugin working correctly on SRSS Linux? >> On my server (Fedora Core 5), it looks like the red and blue colors are >> switched for any flash site, though audio seems to be working fine. I've >> been trying to stick with the Flash 7 plugin, which was working fine, >> but now there are too many web sites that insist on the newer version. >> >> Are other people seeing this problem, or is it working for you, and if >> so, what distribution are you running? > > Hi Dave, > Yes, I am also having this problem - I put it down to the SRSS > compression It's not caused by compression. It's caused by a bug in the flash plugin in that it's assuming the colour mask that the X server is using, instead of querying it. If you use xdpyinfo in your Sun Ray session, you'll probably see something like: red, green, blue masks:0xff, 0xff00, 0xff whereas in your Linux PeeCee, you might see: red, green, blue masks:0xff, 0xff00, 0xff So when the flash plugin assumes the latter, but you're using the former, reds will appear as blue and blues appear as red, but greens will be OK. I'm not sure why the reverse mask if used on Sun Ray, but the root problem is that the flash plugin shouldn't make assumptions. You should try to report this to Adobe - I'm not sure if it's a "known issue" for Linux or not... ~D.. ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
Sean Clarke wrote on 02/26/07 03:04: Dave Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anyone able to get the Flash 9 plugin working correctly on SRSS Linux? On my server (Fedora Core 5), it looks like the red and blue colors are switched for any flash site, though audio seems to be working fine. I've been trying to stick with the Flash 7 plugin, which was working fine, but now there are too many web sites that insist on the newer version. Are other people seeing this problem, or is it working for you, and if so, what distribution are you running? Hi Dave, Yes, I am also having this problem - I put it down to the SRSS compression It's not caused by compression. It's caused by a bug in the flash plugin in that it's assuming the colour mask that the X server is using, instead of querying it. If you use xdpyinfo in your Sun Ray session, you'll probably see something like: red, green, blue masks:0xff, 0xff00, 0xff whereas in your Linux PeeCee, you might see: red, green, blue masks:0xff, 0xff00, 0xff So when the flash plugin assumes the latter, but you're using the former, reds will appear as blue and blues appear as red, but greens will be OK. I'm not sure why the reverse mask if used on Sun Ray, but the root problem is that the flash plugin shouldn't make assumptions. You should try to report this to Adobe - I'm not sure if it's a "known issue" for Linux or not... ~D.. ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
The red-blue colour switch is something i can live with (kind of funny to see smurfs all over the internet). Although i'm curious how you managed to get audio working with flash9. I understand that flash 9 is alsa only, and sunray audio is OSS. Sammy On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:21:30AM -0800, Dave Hwang wrote: > Anyone able to get the Flash 9 plugin working correctly on SRSS Linux? > On my server (Fedora Core 5), it looks like the red and blue colors are > switched for any flash site, though audio seems to be working fine. I've > been trying to stick with the Flash 7 plugin, which was working fine, > but now there are too many web sites that insist on the newer version. > > Are other people seeing this problem, or is it working for you, and if > so, what distribution are you running? > > Dave > > ___ > SunRay-Users mailing list > SunRay-Users@filibeto.org > http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 02:21:30 -0800 Dave Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone able to get the Flash 9 plugin working correctly on SRSS Linux? > On my server (Fedora Core 5), it looks like the red and blue colors are > switched for any flash site, though audio seems to be working fine. I've > been trying to stick with the Flash 7 plugin, which was working fine, > but now there are too many web sites that insist on the newer version. > > Are other people seeing this problem, or is it working for you, and if > so, what distribution are you running? recent Debian/unstable Yes, there is definitely a tint, too much blue and not enough red. (I wouldn't say the colors are switched). No idea how to correct it. Meik -- Meik Hellmund Institut fuer Mathematik, Uni Leipzig e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.math.uni-leipzig.de/~hellmund ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
Re: [SunRay-Users] Flash 9 on SRSS 3.1.1 Linux
Dave Hwang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Anyone able to get the Flash 9 plugin working correctly on SRSS Linux? >On my server (Fedora Core 5), it looks like the red and blue colors are >switched for any flash site, though audio seems to be working fine. I've >been trying to stick with the Flash 7 plugin, which was working fine, >but now there are too many web sites that insist on the newer version. > >Are other people seeing this problem, or is it working for you, and if >so, what distribution are you running? Hi Dave, Yes, I am also having this problem - I put it down to the SRSS compression as I also get artifacts and strange colour changes when I use NX from a Sun Ray. For me, Flash = bad colours + no sound -- -- Regards Sean Clarke - SEC Consulting Limited Phone: +44 (0)23 8040 5599 Website: http://www.sec-consulting.co.uk Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SEC Consulting is a Sun Partner Advantage Member: Sun, keeping 10 moves ahead. http://www.sec-consulting.co.uk/Sun/index.html ___ SunRay-Users mailing list SunRay-Users@filibeto.org http://node1.filibeto.org/mailman/listinfo/sunray-users
