Re: [sunset4] Closing Sunset4

On 05/16/2018 10:08 AM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote: My take is that sunset is a great name. I would have loved to learn in this group a few things: - is there a process in place that gives back to IANA the unused IPv4   space.  How much is this process used? I believe each RIR has a separate

Re: [sunset4] Last Call: (IETF: End Work on IPv4) to Proposed Standard

From: sunset4 on behalf of Phillip Hallam-Baker Date: Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 10:34 AM To: IETF Discussion Mailing List Cc: , , ,

Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf

NVO multicast document would be covered by "No IPv4-only feature will be added unless there's an equivalent feature added in the IPv6 version.” > >Jacques Lee > > >-Original Message- >From: sunset4 [mailto:sunset4-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lee Howard >Sent

Re: [sunset4] IPR Disclosure Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd's Statement about IPR related to draft-ietf-sunset4-gapanalysis

I appreciate this disclosure being filed. Can anyone tell me how to find out more about the disclosed IPR, such as its title, or what it’s about? Thanks, Lee On 9/12/17, 1:18 PM, "sunset4 on behalf of IETF Secretariat" wrote: >Dear Will

[sunset4] draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf

Pending chair approval, I have posted draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf, "IETF: End Work on IPv4² This is the document we discussed at IETF97 in Seoul. Based on comments during that conversation, I have made a couple of edits to the document. It¹s still less than a page of text. There was extended

[sunset4] ietf-nat64

, "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlosm3...@gmail.com> wrote: >Hi all, > >do you know if this hum is happening ? > >-Carlos > >On 7 Oct 2016, at 4:12, Marc Blanchet wrote: > >> On 6 Oct 2016, at 15:03, Lee Howard wrote: >> >>> Run IPv6+NAT64 a

Re: [sunset4] Sunset4 work

tariat or ISOC to make sure to talk with those organizations to let know >them that they have a problem … Do you mean NAT64 on a different SSID as the 464xlat? I'm confused. Lee > > >Saludos, >Jordi > > >-Mensaje original- >De: sunset4 <sunset4-boun...@ietf.org> en n

[sunset4] Sunset4 work

After the last WG meeting, I walked away with seven things that I thought we needed to do: Update my v4historic draft. I intend to do this in time for the Seoul meeting. Phillip Hallam-Baker suggested something like "draft-baker-ipv4status-its-complicated." I would like to hear more about this,