Re: [sup-devel] GPGME fixes

2011-02-17 Thread Hamish D
>> I like the others though, though in applying them I ran into some >> trouble, partly through my adding lines near the top of the file that >> change line numbers and seemed to confuse git. So they are now applied >> to a local copy, but in my name (but with your commit messages). > > What comman

Re: [sup-devel] GPGME fixes

2011-02-17 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Excerpts from Hamish D's message of 2011-02-17 19:45:20 +0100: > > While reimporting all my messages I encountered a few problemes with > > the GPGME code. Please consider the attached fixes. > > 0001-Encode-multipart-messages-for-crypt-operations.patch already > appears to be in master ... Yes t

Re: [sup-devel] GPGME fixes

2011-02-17 Thread Hamish D
> While reimporting all my messages I encountered a few problemes with > the GPGME code. Please consider the attached fixes. 0001-Encode-multipart-messages-for-crypt-operations.patch already appears to be in master ... I like the others though, though in applying them I ran into some trouble, par

[sup-devel] GPGME fixes

2011-02-17 Thread Gaudenz Steinlin
Hi While reimporting all my messages I encountered a few problemes with the GPGME code. Please consider the attached fixes. The second patch depends on the first (error message unification). But if you don't like the first I can easily produce a standalone version. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever