* William Morgan [Mi Mai 18 16:52:59 +0200 2011]
> Reformatted excerpts from Gregor Hoffleit's message of 2011-05-16:
> > The problem with empty recipient strings is still there, I'm afraid.
> > Tested today, with current heliotrope from GIT.
>
> Rats. Can you please add an issue to the heliotrop
Reformatted excerpts from Gregor Hoffleit's message of 2011-05-16:
> The problem with empty recipient strings is still there, I'm afraid.
> Tested today, with current heliotrope from GIT.
Rats. Can you please add an issue to the heliotrope github issue tracker
so that I don't forget about this?
--
* William Morgan [Di Mai 10 19:45:49 +0200 2011]
> Reformatted excerpts from Gregor Hoffleit's message of 2011-04-20:
> >
> > To: , debian-v...@lists.debian.org
> >
> > This code in line 482 of lib/heliotrope/index.rb will fail work if any
> > recipient is empty:
> >
> > message.recipie
Reformatted excerpts from Gregor Hoffleit's message of 2011-04-20:
>
> To: , debian-v...@lists.debian.org
>
> This code in line 482 of lib/heliotrope/index.rb will fail work if any
> recipient is empty:
>
> message.recipients.map { |x| x.indexable_text }.join(" ").downcase
Sorry for the
I noticed that heliotrope-add bangs out on message
from the debian-vote list:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/03/msg00130.html
# ruby1.9.1 -Ilib ./bin/heliotrope-add -m debian-vote-2008 -d test
/home/test/GIT/heliotrope/lib/heliotrope/index.rb:482:in `block in index!':
undefined method
