Gaudenz has submitted a few useful patches which I want to commit to the
gpgme branch, but git apply seems to fail. I've forwarded the message
text below, and attached the patches. When I apply it gpgme, I get:
$ git apply --check --verbose
../patches2merge/0001-Unify-formatting-of-GPGME-error-m
Excerpts from Hamish's message of Sun Feb 20 19:19:17 + 2011:
> Gaudenz has submitted a few useful patches which I want to commit to the
> gpgme branch, but git apply seems to fail. I've forwarded the message
> text below, and attached the patches. When I apply it gpgme, I get:
Of course, havi
Hi,
Excerpts from Hamish's message of 2011-02-20 20:19:17 +0100:
[...]
> I have tried and I can apply these patches by hand, but then they will
> appear as committed by me, rather than giving Gaudenz his due.
You can use git commit --author="Name ", then you
are recorded as committer and the auth
Reformatted excerpts from Hamish's message of 2011-02-20:
> But I can't see why it could not find it. The code quoted above has
> moved down by 31 lines, but is otherwise unchanged, but I thought git
> could cope with that :/
Git apply is a pretty low-level command and I believe it acts basically
Hello
It is often useful to be able to look at messages while writing a message.
While I can exit my editor and look at other messages, and then come back to
my editor, it would be nice to have both open at the same time. So I've
written some code that allows you to do that. When you are in
compo
I use Ctrl-W when deleting labels from a thread, and it's been a minor
annoyance that this is slightly broken - when there is a space before
the cursor, Ctrl-W will just delete the space, and you need to press
Ctrl-W a second time to delete the word aswell. This is not how I'm used
to it working in
Excerpts from Philippe LeCavalier's message of Wed Feb 16 13:33:32 + 2011:
> > Philippe LeCavalier, 2011-02-15 17:37:
> > > Hi All. Just wondering if there has ever been any consideration to
> > > sorting labels alphabetically. I'm assuming the way sup displays the
> > > labels is purely esthet
