Re: [sup-devel] Update in heliotrope !

2012-09-25 Thread Steven Hum
AP server should also work,because it is > transparent to offlineimap (at least from the outside) > > Have fun ! > -- "Truth or die." Steven Hum 5 - 28 Gilmour St Ottawa, ON K2P 0N3 email sdot...@gmail.com tel 613.237.9058 ___ Sup-devel mailing list Sup-devel@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/sup-devel

Re: [sup-devel] Update in heliotrope !

2012-09-25 Thread Steven Hum
README, I had to install the mail and thin gems to get heliotrope to run. Regards, Steven Excerpts from Matthieu Rakotojaona's message of 2012-09-25 15:44:49 -0400: > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Steven Hum wrote: > > Hello Matthieu, > > Hello, > > > I am able

Re: [sup-devel] Update in heliotrope !

2012-09-27 Thread Steven Hum
fundamentally broken on my system if these log files aren't even being written! Regards, Steven Excerpts from Matthieu Rakotojaona's message of 2012-09-27 11:50:40 -0400: > Sorry for the delay. > > On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Steven Hum wrote: > > I presume the

Re: [sup-devel] sup 0.15?

2013-11-10 Thread Steven Hum
cerpts from Gaute Hope's message of 2013-11-05 02:51:42 -0500: > > hi there, > > > > any objections to releasing sup 0.15 (I figured it deserves a whole new > > version number!) with maildir-syncback as it is now? Is it ready to be > > released int

Re: [sup-devel] sup 0.15?

2013-11-10 Thread Steven Hum
gt; any objections to releasing sup 0.15 (I figured it deserves a whole new > version number!) with maildir-syncback as it is now? Is it ready to be > released into the wild? > > (maildir-syncback is now in 'develop' - go ahead and test if you > haven't) > >

Re: [sup-devel] sup 0.15?

2013-11-11 Thread Steven Hum
14 you need to follow > these instructions: > > https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/wiki/Migration-0.13-to-0.14 > > Btw; I haven't seen anything about sup-rmail-1.0.1, is that a debian > package? > > - gaute -- "Truth or

Re: [sup-devel] sup 0.15?

2013-11-12 Thread Steven Hum
from Eric Weikl's message of 2013-11-12 14:42:50 -0500: > Hi Steven, > > On 11/11/2013 14:18:45, Steven Hum wrote: > > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. My sources.yaml file was > > unchanged from sup 0.14.x but only had one source defined in it. I was >