Re: Some wishes for s6-log & s6-envdir

2015-02-25 Thread Colin Booth
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Olivier Brunel wrote: > On 02/26/15 01:06, Colin Booth wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Olivier Brunel wrote: >> /bin/emptyenv -p s6-envdir /path/to/env exec >> should be good enough. It's still an extra command over what you're >> looking for, but as lo

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread John Regan
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:38:14AM +, Dreamcat4 wrote: > Really overwhelmed by all this. It is a much more positive response > than expected. And many good things. I am very grateful. Some bits I > still like us to continue discussion upon. > > But Gornak - I must say that your new ubuntu base

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread Dreamcat4
Really overwhelmed by all this. It is a much more positive response than expected. And many good things. I am very grateful. Some bits I still like us to continue discussion upon. But Gornak - I must say that your new ubuntu base image really seem *a lot* better than the phusion/baseimage one. It

Re: Some wishes for s6-log & s6-envdir

2015-02-25 Thread Olivier Brunel
On 02/26/15 01:06, Colin Booth wrote: > On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Olivier Brunel wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Sorry, no bug reports; Couple of feature wishes though :p >> >> E.g. I have a script that I need to run, but I don't know what the >> original environment is. Right now I have it start with:

Re: Some wishes for s6-log & s6-envdir

2015-02-25 Thread Colin Booth
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Olivier Brunel wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry, no bug reports; Couple of feature wishes though :p > > E.g. I have a script that I need to run, but I don't know what the > original environment is. Right now I have it start with: > /bin/emptyenv /bin/s6-envdir /path/to/env /

Some wishes for s6-log & s6-envdir

2015-02-25 Thread Olivier Brunel
Hi, Sorry, no bug reports; Couple of feature wishes though :p - s6-envdir: an option to clear the environment first would be nice, so we know the environment that it will execute into is coming from envdir only, without possible "leftovers" - s6-envdir: also, an option to look for prog (to exec

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread John Albietz
Interesting work Gorka! Thx for sharing and keep it up. Seeing examples of how people are using s6, particularly including the build/compile steps, makes it much easier to test it out etc. - John > On Feb 25, 2015, at 12:23 PM, Gorka Lertxundi wrote: > > John, > > > > > I got to s6 beca

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 25/02/2015 21:23, Gorka Lertxundi wrote: Laurent, any differences between `kill -15 1` and `s6-svscanctl -t /path/to/whatever`? Well, maybe it's not the case with a fake process 1 created by Docker, but normally "kill -15 1" just doesn't work. The kernel is supposed to ignore any signal se

Re: [announce] s6-2.1.1.2

2015-02-25 Thread Gorka Lertxundi
Cool! Statically compiled versions are available too: https://github.com/glerchundi/container-s6-builder/releases/tag/v1.2.0 musl: 1.0.4 skalibs: 2.3.1.0 execline: 2.1.0.0 s6: 2.1.1.2 s6-portable-utils: 2.0.0.1 On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Laurent Bercot wrote: > Hello, >

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread Gorka Lertxundi
John, I got to s6 because I read your post so...big thanks! :-) [...] release feature like that. Expect a pull request soon for the other s6 packages. They are always welcomed! [...] wanted to let you know this image is pretty sweet and makes mine look like garbage :) C'm

[announce] s6-2.1.1.2

2015-02-25 Thread Laurent Bercot
Hello, s6-2.1.1.2 is out. It fixes: - a bug in s6-log that wasn't parsing correctly multiple sets of selections/actions; - a bug in s6-fdholderd that would crash when provided with certain configurations. It depends on skalibs-2.3.1.0 and execline-2.1.0.0, also newly released. http://ska

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread John Regan
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:58:07PM +0100, Gorka Lertxundi wrote: > Hello, > > After that great john's post, I tried to solve exactly your same problems. I > created my own base image based primarily on John's and Phusion's base > images. That's awesome - I get so excited when I hear somebody's ac

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread Gorka Lertxundi
Hello, After that great john's post, I tried to solve exactly your same problems. I created my own base image based primarily on John's and Phusion's base images. See my thoughts below. 2015-02-25 12:30 GMT+01:00 Laurent Bercot : > > (Moving the discussion to the supervision@list.skarnet.org l

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread John Regan
Hi Dreamcat4 - First thing's first - I can't stress enough how awesome it is to know people are using/talking about my Docker images, blog posts, and so on. Too cool! I've responded to your concerns/questions/etc throughout the email below. -John On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:32:37AM +, Dreamc

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread Laurent Bercot
(Moving the discussion to the supervision@list.skarnet.org list. The original message is quoted below.) Hi Dreamcat4, Thanks for your detailed message. I'm very happy that s6 found an application in docker, and that there's such an interest for it! skaw...@list.skarnet.org is indeed the righ