I would appreciate advise as to whether these are acceptable questions
for this list?
I would like to use the s6-log features for applications that have
difficult log management. In this instance, apache. From
procstat –f `pgrep httpd`
we're advised that each http has write-append to the ErrorLog
Thanks Laurent, the additional insight is appreciated (you should have a
skarnet.org/software/ page for "Insights and Philosophy" ;) )
A few years ago I managed a small outsource, the systems were rebooted
when UPS batteries were replaced or a disk mirror problem arose.
Because we used FreeBSD's j
Sorry for my side note: but I have to say, that these discussions are
really great!
I thought it would be just boring as it started. But from my side I can
tell you, that I learn a lot because you talk about reasons to do
something or to let something.
It's far better than "I believe" and "I like
Please stop breaking threads. This makes conversations needlessly
difficult to follow, and clutters up mailboxes.
i do that intentionally since i find the opposite easier to follow.
that leads often to complaints on other lists aswell.
Oh? And the other complaints haven't given you a clue?
We
16.05.2019, 10:31, "Laurent Bercot" :
>> The Question: As a newbie outsider I wonder, after following the
>> discussion of supervision and tasks on stages (1,2,3), that there is a
>> restrictive linear progression that prevents reversal. In terms of pid1
>> that I may not totally understand, is the
> process #1 should not rely on conditions that it has not previously
> ascertained to be true (eg by setting something up by itself, so it
> exists and is safe to use/rely on it).
> sounds self-evident ? sadly many inits do not comply with that
> postulation, a well known example that comes immed
new postulation:
process #1 should not rely on conditions that it has not previously
ascertained to be true (eg by setting something up by itself, so it
exists and is safe to use/rely on it).
sounds self-evident ? sadly many inits do not comply with that
postulation, a well known example that com
11.05.2019, 15:33, "Laurent Bercot" :
> Please stop breaking threads. This makes conversations needlessly
> difficult to follow, and clutters up mailboxes.
i do that intentionally since i find the opposite easier to follow.
that leads often to complaints on other lists aswell.
> That is obviously
The Question: As a newbie outsider I wonder, after following the
discussion of supervision and tasks on stages (1,2,3), that there is a
restrictive linear progression that prevents reversal. In terms of pid1
that I may not totally understand, is there a way that an admin can
reduce the system ba
