26.04.2019, 20:51, "Laurent Bercot" :
> You need to be able to take "no" for an answer.
i can do that.
and that will be probably the answer i will get from perp's author
aswell (dunno if he reads this list).
it is just important for me to know if this functionality will be added
or not since i ha
it should not be to much of an effort to add this functionality
to s6-svscan (and perp(d) for that).
You need to be able to take "no" for an answer.
--
Laurent
26.04.2019, 11:44, "Laurent Bercot" :
> You need to have execline installed to run s6 anyway.
true. but adding the required code to s6-svscan as
daemontools-encore did would obsolete execline at least for
this purpose entirely (which is a good thing IMO).
it should not be to much of an effort to
i think this feature does not require too much "ad-hoc" C code in
the svscan source. it is easy to do that in C while it becomes hard
to impossible do write a shell script that does it (ok, in execline
this seems to be possible, but you need that package installed then).
You need to have execl
I saw this a couple of days ago in the Git repository. So, what's your
stance on the (soon to be) 'old' execline stage1, stage3 and
.s6-svscan/SIGxxx files approach? Will you consider it deprecated, or
just an alternative to the s6-linux-init-1.0.0.0 approach? Are the
version 0.4.0.1 s6-linux-init
Hi,
El jue., 25 abr. 2019 a las 20:10, Laurent Bercot escribió:
>
> I would recommend you to grab the 0.4.0.1 release of s6-linux-init
> and use the stage 1 scripts created by s6-linux-init-maker, either as
> is, or as a source of inspiration for your own stage 1 scripts.
> [...]
> I would also re
26.04.2019, 01:10, "Laurent Bercot" :
> The bad news is that the way daemontools-encore's svscan manages
> its catch-all logger is almost exactly the way I do it in my stage 1
> scripts, except it requires ad-hoc code in svscan.
but this "ad-hoc code" is in C and does not require any execline tric
hello,
i am a new subscriber to this mailing list.
Hi Jeff, and welcome!
i saw that daemontools-encore svscan provides an option to
specify a special catch-all logging service for svscan and its child
supervise processes:
(...)
it would be very nice for s6(-svscan) and perp(d) to provide suc
hello,
i am a new subscriber to this mailing list.
i saw that daemontools-encore svscan provides an option to
specify a special catch-all logging service for svscan and its child
supervise processes:
svscan [ directory ] [ log-service ]
If the 'log-service' option is specified and the named s
