Re: ipc in process #1

2019-05-10 Thread Laurent Bercot
IMO process #1 should be solely signal driven. i guess there is no need for further ipc by other means, escpecially for those that require rw fs access to work (eg fifos, unix sockets). The devil is in the details here. Theoretically, yes, you're right. In practice, only using signals to

ipc in process #1

2019-05-09 Thread Jeff
IMO process #1 should be solely signal driven. i guess there is no need for further ipc by other means, escpecially for those that require rw fs access to work (eg fifos, unix sockets). process #1 has to react to (some) incoming signals and thus signal handling has to be enabled anyway (mainly