Re: nosh: User-space virtual terminal test and questions

2019-01-10 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
The blue/green problem only manifested itself with certain terminal types, which I was not regularly using. Since you have 1.39 built, and as long as you built from today's snapshot, you can be the second person in the world to enjoy this: while true ; do printf '\f' ; top -b -n 1 | sed -e

Re: nosh: User-space virtual terminal test and questions

2019-01-10 Thread Guillermo
El dom., 6 ene. 2019 a las 8:27, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard escribió: > > Use > |console-control-sequence --foreground blue|console-decode-ecma48| from > version 1.39 on that terminal. What do you see? SGR 34? SGR 38;5;4? > Or SGR 38;2;... ? Well, guess what. I built in-development 1.39 and it

Re: nosh: User-space virtual terminal test and questions

2019-01-06 Thread Guillermo
El dom., 6 ene. 2019 a las 8:27, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard escribió: > > > The combination of vboxvideo with |console-fb-realizer| was explosive, > > I got a (guest) kernel panic. > > > [...] > so I'm initially going to lay that one at the door of the driver. Yeah, I'm suspicious about the kernel

Re: nosh: User-space virtual terminal test and questions

2019-01-06 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Guillermo: The combination of vboxvideo with |console-fb-realizer| was explosive, I got a (guest) kernel panic. |console-fb-realizer| does not employ the arcana of framebuffer I/O, it just using little more than the mode setting API and memory mapped I/O, so I'm initially going to lay that o

nosh: User-space virtual terminal test and questions

2019-01-05 Thread Guillermo
Hello, So, I've gotten around to testing user-space VTs with nosh tools on Gentoo, as described in the nosh Guide. Mostly console-fb-realizer, but I also tested console-termio-realizer on a kernel VT for comparison. This was in a VirtualBox VM, so there were two framebuffer devices available: the