Re: runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-22 Thread Avery Payne
On 6/20/2015 3:58 AM, Lasse Kliemann wrote: Gerrit Pape p...@smarden.org writes: First is moving away from slashpackage. Doing it similar to what Laurant does in his current projects sounds good to me, but I didn't look into details. This even might include moving away from the djblib

Re: runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

2015-06-22 Thread Avery Payne
On 6/18/2015 6:24 PM, Buck Evan wrote: Thanks Gerrit. How would you like to see the layout, build process look? Maybe there's an example project you like? If it's easy enough for me to try, I'd like to. I pulled Gerrit's stuff into bitbucket a few days ago. The first step I would humbly

A general sequence of events for init

2015-06-22 Thread Avery Payne
I have this crazy dream. I dream that, for supervision-styled frameworks, there will be a unified init sequence. * It will not matter what supervision framework you use. All of them will start properly after the init sequence completes. * It will not matter how sophisticated your

Re: A general sequence of events for init

2015-06-22 Thread Avery Payne
On 6/22/2015 6:42 PM, post-sysv wrote: Handling stages 1 and 3 may need some additions to conditional logic, however. The idea would be that different plugins would represent some abstract notion at some stage in the boot process, i.e. mount the root filesystem would be abstracted away to a