On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> >If you are a systemd user, chances are you do not need s6.
> >
> >Really? So all the criticism of systemd is bunkum?
>
> :) I need to update this page.
> What this means is that systemd does provide a supervision
> infrastructure, so for people
On Wed, 10 Jan 2018, Avery Payne wrote:
> I am guessing the differences will be subtle, and most of the general
> behavior you desire will remain the same. You may be able to get a way
> with a "sed 's/sv\ /s6-sv\ /' new-script-name" on some of
> your scripts; give it a try, what could it hurt?
