Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

[Casper Ti. Vector]

On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 02:26:44PM +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
> If you are a regular non-anonymous Slashdot reader, I will be very
> grateful if you can vote my recent comment up:
> 

A system proponent gave a remark about nosh's `move-to-control-group',
which appears, to some degree, justified:

Perhaps Jonathan can somehow make the code look better?

-- 
My current OpenPGP key:
RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19)
7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C

Re: The "Unix Philosophy 2020" document

[Casper Ti. Vector]

On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 01:37:43AM +0800, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
> [...] Consequently I think that, with an appropriate amount
> of publicity for the document, much more people would be willing
> to keep an eye on, migrate to, or even help develop daemontools-ish
> systems, potentially creating a mini-avalanche effect or even resulting
> in a turning point in the "init wars". [...]

If you are a regular non-anonymous Slashdot reader, I will be very
grateful if you can vote my recent comment up:


[I know it is not quite decent to rally for votes in this situation, but
I consider it some kind of "necessary evil" to raise the (long overdue)
public awareness of daemontools-like init/rc systems.]

-- 
My current OpenPGP key:
RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19)
7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C