Re: [announce] execline-2.5.0.0

2018-04-02 7:39 GMT-03:00 Laurent Bercot: > > User reports have come in by the hundreds and they are almost > unanimous (sorry, Colin): they don't like the 2.4.0.0 change, > pretending it hurts readability (as if), and writability too, > of execline scripts. (What? People were actually writing

Re: [announce] execline-2.5.0.0

Hi! On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 12:06:05PM +, John O'Meara wrote: > While I initially didn't like the 2.4 name changes, perhaps I (and others) I believe 2.4 was just 1st April's joke. -- WBR, Alex.

Re: [announce] execline-2.5.0.0

On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 8:06 AM John O'Meara wrote: > While I initially didn't like the 2.4 name changes, perhaps I (and others) > just need tinge to get used too it. that should have been "time", not "tinge". The perils of writing email on a phone :-( Perhaps it would

Re: [announce] execline-2.5.0.0

While I initially didn't like the 2.4 name changes, perhaps I (and others) just need tinge to get used too it. Perhaps it would be useful to have a period of time where the old names are used for the programs and the new names are symlinks to the old names? Existing scripts would still work while

[announce] execline-2.5.0.0

Hello, execline-2.5.0.0 is out. It is with a very heavy heart that I must do this release. User reports have come in by the hundreds and they are almost unanimous (sorry, Colin): they don't like the 2.4.0.0 change, pretending it hurts readability (as if), and writability too, of execline