Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?
On 5/14/2015 3:47 PM, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote: There are even more than that. I mentioned back in January that the nosh Guide chapter on creating service bundles has pointers to the run file collections by Gerrit Pape, Wayne Marshall, Kevin J. DeGraaf, and Glenn Strauss. I also pointed out that nosh came with some 177 pre-built service bundles. That figure has since risen to some 230-odd (not including log services). We are supervision-scripts. Lower your firewalls and surrender your source. We will add your definitions and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your framework will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile. Oops, sorry, don't know what came over me...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borg_%28Star_Trek%29#cite_note-4 I will most assuredly pursue those 'service bundles' from *all* of the above authors when time permits... believe me, I've already scoured out most of github and bitbucket. I've also done a few off of runit's definitions. Nosh is still on my to-do list. Near as I can tell, it shouldn't be too hard to include support for it, but I won't really know until I get a full VM cooked. I think the quickest way to get this accomplished - for both nosh and s6 - is to install Debian 8 sans systemd into a VM image. From there I can add your new Debian packages to get nosh installed, and I will finally have GNU make 4.0 for building s6.
Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?
Avery Payne: There's already a project for adding definitions for various daemons. http://bitbucket.org/avery_payne/supervision-scripts There are even more than that. I mentioned back in January that the nosh Guide chapter on creating service bundles has pointers to the run file collections by Gerrit Pape, Wayne Marshall, Kevin J. DeGraaf, and Glenn Strauss. I also pointed out that nosh came with some 177 pre-built service bundles. That figure has since risen to some 230-odd (not including log services). Of course, I do sometimes get to just take systemd units and convert them. * http://unix.stackexchange.com/a/200281/5132 * http://askubuntu.com/a/617822/43344
Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Avery Payne avery.p.pa...@gmail.com wrote: On 4/28/2015 6:56 AM, bougyman wrote: https://github.com/voidlinux/void-runit The list of directories in /services only shows entries for getties, are all of the other definitions inside of their respective packages? That is correct, our packages provide an /etc/sv/servicename if appropriate. Tj
Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?
John Regan j...@jrjrtech.com writes: It's not quite the same, but I think Alpine linux is pretty close to what you're looking for. They'd probably love to get more people involved, writing documentation, making packages, etc. Yes, I'm familiar with Alpine. It's a great distro in the minimalist spirit. I use it for some things locally. Maybe it is a better use of my time to contribute to it, rather than going off and doing my own thing. I still haven't completely made up my mind on that. -- Chris
Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?
Hi, I was wondering if we're still in the perpetrator maling lits :D cause I didn't use to use s6 tools, but yes Chris I'm motivated to work in such project with you. Let me know how to get contact with you and participate to the project Look forward to reading from you. Best regards, Eugène NG 2015-04-19 18:09 GMT+01:00 Avery Payne avery.p.pa...@gmail.com: On 4/19/2015 7:03 AM, John Regan wrote: It's not quite the same, but I think Alpine linux is pretty close to what you're looking for. They'd probably love to get more people involved, writing documentation, making packages, etc. It doesn't use s6, but I've submitted the s6 packages to the project. Maybe you could work on adding s6 init scripts to packages? There's already a project for adding definitions for various daemons. http://bitbucket.org/avery_payne/supervision-scripts -- ngont...@epitech.net sympav...@gmail.com *Aux hommes il faut un chef, et au* * chef il faut des hommes!L'habit ne fait pas le moine, mais lorsqu'on te voit on te juge!*
Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?
On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Laurent Bercot ska-supervis...@skarnet.org wrote: If I ever have to install a distribution again, I'll probably go with Alpine, unless something even better comes along. I also would use Alpine, except they just don't comprehensively support all up-to-date packages. ATM, no other linux distro touches ubuntu + PPA for package support. Just doing nearly anything. It's pretty much guaranteed. Therefore, sorry to say: I use ubuntu debootstrap min-base for all server stuff. And ubuntu desktop for a GUI environment. There's nothing wrong with extolling the virtues of these respective distros. However I am a practically person. And when lacking pkgs = not practical / time efficient to fill in so many missing gaps. I do agree with the sentiments here and hope that pkg support may continue improve for alpine linux in particular. But i myself simply cannot justify changing over until then. Being realistic the timescale is probably more towards several years than several months. You can disagree with me on the respective levels of package support. But I'll probably just laugh at you all. Kind Regards -- Laurent
Re: Arch Linux derivative using s6?
On 4/19/2015 7:03 AM, John Regan wrote: It's not quite the same, but I think Alpine linux is pretty close to what you're looking for. They'd probably love to get more people involved, writing documentation, making packages, etc. It doesn't use s6, but I've submitted the s6 packages to the project. Maybe you could work on adding s6 init scripts to packages? There's already a project for adding definitions for various daemons. http://bitbucket.org/avery_payne/supervision-scripts
