On 16/01/2015 01:05, Steve Litt wrote:
http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/init/features_and_benefits.htm
(I'm lacking sleep and I'm going to talk about systemd. Not a good
combination. So, apologies in advance for the rant, for the inevitable
coarse language, and for the very opinionated
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:12:07 +0100
Laurent Bercot ska-supervis...@skarnet.org wrote:
On 16/01/2015 01:05, Steve Litt wrote:
http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/init/features_and_benefits.htm
(I'm lacking sleep and I'm going to talk about systemd. Not a good
combination. So, apologies in
Hi Laurent,
Thanks for this.
I would only add: it is *extremely* unfortunate that service
management frameworks have come to be so conflated with pid 1.
With the focus turned so exclusively on init, many people are losing
sight of the benefits of supervision in general, and portable,
Hi all,
I'm writing you because you're by far the most init aware people I
know. I've created a web page about features and benefits of a few init
systems. The audience for this web page isn't people like all of you,
but instead for the average DIY Linux user, so it deliberately contains
some
On 01/15/2015 07:05 PM, Steve Litt wrote:
Hi all,
I'm writing you because you're by far the most init aware people I
know. I've created a web page about features and benefits of a few init
systems. The audience for this web page isn't people like all of you,
but instead for the average DIY
