Re: The plans for Alpine Linux

2016-03-03 Thread Avery Payne
On 2/3/2016 9:30 AM, Steve Litt wrote: Hi Laurent, The situation you describe, with the maintainer of a distro's maintainer for a specific daemon packaging every "policy" for every init system and service manager, is certainly something we're working toward. But there are obstacles: * Daemon

Re: The plans for Alpine Linux

2016-02-27 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 03/02/2016 18:30, Steve Litt wrote: The situation you describe, with the maintainer of a distro's maintainer for a specific daemon packaging every "policy" for every init system and service manager, is certainly something we're working toward. This is certainly a possible, even a

Re: The plans for Alpine Linux

2016-02-27 Thread Steve Litt
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 13:08:33 -0300 Guillermo wrote: > From this thread: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/supervision@list.skarnet.org/msg01123.html > > 2016-01-27 9:16 GMT-03:00 Laurent Bercot: > > > > The biggest hurdle that *every* distribution faces is that every >

Re: The plans for Alpine Linux

2016-01-31 Thread Laurent Bercot
On 31/01/2016 17:08, Guillermo wrote: So, are you willing to share the plans for this? I take it you'll write, or help the distribution's developers do so, s6-rc service definitions for Alpine so it will be able to boot with s6 + s6-rc, as an alternative to BusyBox init + OpenRC? Yes. It's