On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 08:02:44PM +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> There is no fundamental reason why it doesn't. inotify works on tmpfs;
> you don't need to poll for the existence of /run/udev/control, you can
> inotifywait for its appearance.
Thanks. I just did not take inotify into consideratio
This has obvious benefits, at least for now. udevd does not have
a readiness notification mechanism (polling for the existence of
/run/udev/control surely does not count)
There is no fundamental reason why it doesn't. inotify works on tmpfs;
you don't need to poll for the existence of /run/udev
I recently added service definitions for mdevd into slew, during which
I switched from a `devd' longrun (which has a dedicated logger, and so
requires a R/W filesystem) that depends on a `devices' oneshot (starting
a temporary devd process to coldplug basic devices) plus a `devd'
longrun to a singl