Re: nosh version 1.37

2018-02-20 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Guillermo: Did someone else help with that? No. I am reliant upon you and anyone else who pipes up. Guillermo: if you are going to go this route: Yes. I thought about it and it seemed that doing otherwise places the burden on the wrong person. The other approach is to defer running the

Re: nosh version 1.37

2018-02-20 Thread Guillermo
2018-02-20 16:13 GMT-03:00 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > > Guillermo: >> >> redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: services/dbus-broker.service: Not done. >> redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: services/dbus-daemon.service: Not done. >> redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: services/system-wide.conf: Not done. >> redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR

Re: nosh version 1.37

2018-02-20 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Guillermo: redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: services/dbus-broker.service: Not done. redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: services/dbus-daemon.service: Not done. redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: services/system-wide.conf: Not done. redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: systemd/service-manager.socket: Not done. redo-ifchange[2]: ERROR: co

Re: nosh version 1.37

2018-02-18 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Guillermo: But the 7 .do scripts I talked about are executed (indirectly) by the package/compile script from the source package, and they just create symbolic links. To be precise, they are executed by the source/all.do script, because they are named in 'echo' commands that feed their output t

Re: nosh version 1.37

2018-02-18 Thread Guillermo
2018-02-18 20:05 GMT-03:00 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > > Guillermo: > >> This is going to happen for every [GNU/]Linux distribution that is not >> Debian, Arch, CentOS or RHEL. It does not... uh... look very portable :/ >> > > That is a reflection of reality. It isn't very portable. But you are

Re: nosh version 1.37

2018-02-18 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Guillermo: This is going to happen for every [GNU/]Linux distribution that is not Debian, Arch, CentOS or RHEL. It does not... uh... look very portable :/ That is a reflection of reality. It isn't very portable. But you are misidentifying what it is. It is the location of these various

Re: nosh version 1.37

2018-02-18 Thread Guillermo
2018-02-18 3:49 GMT-03:00 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard: > > The nosh package is now up to version 1.37 . > [...] >Per-user management has been augmented, finally fixing the problem >of |system-control| locating the per-user manager by giving the >per-user manager an optional listening FIFO

nosh version 1.37

2018-02-17 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
The nosh package is now up to version 1.37 . * http://jdebp.eu./Softwares/nosh/ * https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2017-07-2017-09.html#The-nosh-Project * http://jdebp.info./Softwares/nosh/ Some of the changes in this release are works in progress, that you will see