On 2/10/2015 9:58 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:22:26 +0100
Laurent Bercot wrote:
On 09/02/2015 18:50, Buck Evan wrote:
Is there truly no public access to the source control for runit?
If so, it's decidedly odd.
Not that odd.
Small projects don't really need an SCM. Most
On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:22:26 +0100
Laurent Bercot wrote:
> On 09/02/2015 18:50, Buck Evan wrote:
> > Is there truly no public access to the source control for runit?
> > If so, it's decidedly odd.
>
> Not that odd.
> Small projects don't really need an SCM. Most pre-git SCMs are
> cumbersome
I've made a repo here, just to keep track of my own issues and patches:
https://github.com/bukzor/runit
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins <
jroll...@finestructure.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09 2015, Buck Evan wrote:
> > Is there truly no public access to the source control
On Mon, Feb 09 2015, Buck Evan wrote:
> Is there truly no public access to the source control for runit?
>
> If so, it's decidedly odd.
I agree it's a bit odd. Or at least it would be useful for it to be
available.
jamie.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 09/02/2015 18:50, Buck Evan wrote:
Is there truly no public access to the source control for runit?
If so, it's decidedly odd.
Not that odd.
Small projects don't really need an SCM. Most pre-git SCMs are
cumbersome or impractical. runit predates git. Gerrit chose to
focus on the code, not
Is there truly no public access to the source control for runit?
If so, it's decidedly odd.
