Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread John Regan
Hi Dreamcat4 - First thing's first - I can't stress enough how awesome it is to know people are using/talking about my Docker images, blog posts, and so on. Too cool! I've responded to your concerns/questions/etc throughout the email below. -John On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 11:32:37AM +,

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread John Regan
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 03:58:07PM +0100, Gorka Lertxundi wrote: Hello, After that great john's post, I tried to solve exactly your same problems. I created my own base image based primarily on John's and Phusion's base images. That's awesome - I get so excited when I hear somebody's

[announce] s6-2.1.1.2

2015-02-25 Thread Laurent Bercot
Hello, s6-2.1.1.2 is out. It fixes: - a bug in s6-log that wasn't parsing correctly multiple sets of selections/actions; - a bug in s6-fdholderd that would crash when provided with certain configurations. It depends on skalibs-2.3.1.0 and execline-2.1.0.0, also newly released.

Re: process supervisor - considerations for docker

2015-02-25 Thread Laurent Bercot
(Moving the discussion to the supervision@list.skarnet.org list. The original message is quoted below.) Hi Dreamcat4, Thanks for your detailed message. I'm very happy that s6 found an application in docker, and that there's such an interest for it! skaw...@list.skarnet.org is indeed the