Avery Payne writes:
>> I think the whole idea of "registered namespaces for software packages"
>> is a good idea and should be supported. There are of course different
>> ways of implementing it.
> Why not keep slashpackage as an "alternative" installation method? Is
> there any reason you can'
On 23/06/2015 12:40, Lasse Kliemann wrote:
At the moment, I am just interested in whether people (especially people
on this list) believe there is something wrong with slashpackage, and if
so, what it is in particular.
Short answer: it's a political issue, not a technical one.
Long answer:
