Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 06:41:56PM +0100, Oliver Schad wrote:
> > The reason I think it's mostly useless is because the only use case
> > for cgroup supervision is supervising double-forking daemons, which
> > is not a very smart thing to do. A much better approach is to get rid
> > of
On Sun, 29 Dec 2019 18:07:39 +0200
Alex Suykov wrote:
> Er, that whole quoted part, including the last sentence, is about
> using cgroups to supervise processes. Not about the use of cgroups in
> general. I can't think of any other use cases where cgroup
> supervision would be useful, other than
