* Laurent Bercot [20140723 23:17]:
> On 23/07/2014 20:16, Wayne Marshall wrote:
> >In the best of un!x traditions, a stronger system may in fact be one
> >that recognizes the fundamental differences between the two
> >functions, and provides purpose-specific solutions for each of them.
>
> This i
* Laurent Bercot [20140727 00:53]:
> On 26/07/2014 20:47, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> >What "tricky" responsabilities are you thinking of for /sbin/init that
> >would make it Linux specific?
>
> s6-svscan wants a read-write directory to run in, and another to
&g
* Charlie Brady [20140730 00:37]:
>
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, James Powell wrote:
>
> > A replacement is something to replace a faulty or broken part. Sysvinit,
> > in our any many others' opinions, was not broken.
>
> Seriously? Start something, often something crucial to the running of the
> s
* Wayne Marshall [20141103 17:10]:
> Would someone kindly provide a real-world example of a service
> dependency? That is, some service "foo" that critically depends on
> another service "bar", and that satisfies either or both of the
> following conditions:
>
> c1: service "foo" MUST NOT be st
* Laurent Bercot [20151226 12:33]:
> In the past few years, there have been some bits and pieces of
> discussion about "instanced services", i.e. some kind of supervised
> service that would be able to create different instances of the
> process at will. But it never got very detailed.
>
> I'd
* Laurent Bercot [20160623 14:20]:
> On 23/06/2016 03:46, Thomas Lau wrote:
> >LOL, well I am trying to do drill test and see how resilience of runit
> >could be, this is one of the minor downfall.
>
> Current supervisors have no way of knowing that they died and
> their child is still running.
[sorry for replying late, catching up]
* Laurent Bercot [20160627 18:05]:
> On 27/06/2016 14:02, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:
> >However, couldn't they know whether their child did not cease to run
> >because
> >of a signal they sent?
>
> I'm not sure abo
* Casper Ti. Vector [20170502 12:48]:
> On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 08:51:19AM +, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> > If I were to work on a more official, better integrated solution, I would
> > do it at the s6-supervise level. I would not implement custom control
> > scripts, for the reasons indicated i
* Laurent Bercot [20190618 08:22]:
> >FYI: The fifo queue permissions, which the jail sees
> >pr---w 1 mylogger www 0B May 31 13:27 apache24-error|
>
> Ah, so the www group is the one that writes to the fifo. Got it.
>
> Then you don't need mylogger to belong to the www group (and
> it
* Dewayne Geraghty [20190618 09:38]:
> # ktrace -f /tmp/s-log.txt -p 83417
> ktrace: /tmp/s-log.txt: Function not implemented
>
> Its a preproduction box, everything optimised and stripped (no debug
> symbols).
Apparently you've stripped
options KTRACE
from your kernel config. Boot GENERIC
10 matches
Mail list logo
